Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 228/04 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; collective agreement not labor law source or third-party performance contract.

Numéro de cause I PK 228/04
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected the plaintiff's claim for compensation. The plaintiff, a former manager, sought damages based on a collective agreement between trade unions and a strategic investor, arguing it functioned as a source of labor law or a contract for third-party performance. The court held that the agreement was merely a source of mutual obligations between the signatories and did not create direct rights for employees against the employer, nor did it constitute a labor law source or a third-party performance contract under the cited statutes.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 9 § 1 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.c.; A collective agreement between trade unions and a strategic investor is not a source of labor law nor a contract for third-party performance, as it creates only mutual obligations between the signatories without establishing direct rights for employees against the employer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
collective agreement source of labor law third party performance cassation appeal employee rights trade union strategic investor

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 9 § 1 k.p.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.c.
Art. 4771 k.p.c.
Art. 39312 k.p.c.
art. 9 k.p
art. 393 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 393 § 1 k.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet