Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PK 223/04 Généré par l'IA

Social package agreement between union and investor not collective agreement under Labor Code Art. 9.

Numéro de cause I PK 223/04
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a judgment that rejected the employee's claim for severance pay based on a 'Social Package'. The employee argued the package constituted a collective agreement under Labor Code Art. 9, but the court found it was merely a commercial transaction between the investor and unions lacking legal force. Consequently, the court ruled that such agreements do not create binding labor law obligations enforceable by individual employees.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 9 ust. 1 k.p.; Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.: A social package agreement concluded between a future investor and trade unions during privatization is not a collective agreement under Art. 9 of the Labor Code and does not create binding labor law obligations for individual employees.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
social package agreement collective agreement status labor code art 9 privatization social terms individual employee claim trade union agreement severance pay dispute

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 9 ust. 1 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 9 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 59 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 300 k.p
art. 59 ust. 2 Konstytucji
art. 39312 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet