Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 232/08 AI generated

Supreme Court held that a bonus regulation is a normative act, not a civil legal act, requiring labor law interpretation methods.

Case Number II PK 232/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected her claim for unpaid commissions. The plaintiff argued that the bank's bonus regulation created a binding right to payment, while the bank contended the regulation was merely an internal reward scheme without legal force. The court ruled that such regulations are normative acts governed by labor law interpretation rules rather than civil law principles of will expression.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9 k.p.; Art. 65 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.: A bonus regulation is a normative act, not a civil legal act, and must be interpreted using labor law methods, with civil law rules on will expression applied only exceptionally.

Keywords

AI generated
normative act classification labor law interpretation bonus regulation status civil law application cassation appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9 k.p.
Art. 65 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.
Art. 13 k.p.
Art. 78 § 1 k.p.
Art. 80 k.p.
Art. 18 k.p.
Art. 379 § 1 k.c.
Art. 9 § 1 k.p.
Art. 233 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 231 k.p.c.
Art. 322 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text