I BP 1/06
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming unfairness for choosing one valid legal interpretation over another.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the Ombudsman's complaint regarding a final labor court judgment. The appellant argued the lower court erred by selecting a specific legal interpretation of the law, which they claimed was incorrect. The Court ruled that choosing between multiple valid interpretations of a statute does not constitute a violation of law requiring compensation.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAart. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 417 § 1 i art. 4171 § 2 k.c.: A court decision based on a legal provision allowing for multiple valid interpretations is not considered inconsistent with the law, even if the chosen interpretation is later deemed incorrect.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
interpretation of law
violation of law
compensation claim
final judgment
labor dispute
legal uncertainty
supreme court
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAart. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 417 § 1 k.c.
art. 4171 § 2 k.c.
art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c
art. 4171 § 2 k.c
art. 51 k.p
art. 51 § 1 k.p
art. 51 § 2 k.p
art. 47 § 1 k.p
art. 56 k.p
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAII BP 3/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-compliance with law regarding late statute of limitations objection.
II BP 1/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming final judgment violated law due to ambiguous regulation interpretation.
II BP 6/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming illegal dismissal, ruling it cannot be used merely to seek compensation for any flawed judgment.
I CNP 33/06
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; factual findings and legal characterization of transport contract were not erroneous.
V CNP 68/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming new procedural rule violated constitutional rights and caused state compensation liability.
I PK 144/05
Employee restored by court order does not earn vacation leave rights for the period of forced unemployment.