II BP 1/05
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming final judgment violated law due to ambiguous regulation interpretation.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the defendant hospital's appeal challenging a final labor court judgment awarding seniority pay to a nurse. The lower court applied more favorable rules to the plaintiff because the hospital's internal regulation improperly excluded her prior work experience, violating equal treatment principles. The Supreme Court held that when a regulation can be reasonably interpreted in multiple ways, a final judgment based on one valid interpretation cannot be deemed legally inconsistent.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 4244 k.p.c.; Art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c. A final court decision cannot be declared inconsistent with the law if the cited regulations admit of reasonable alternative interpretations supported by convincing arguments.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
final judgment review
legal inconsistency appeal
regulation interpretation
reasonable doubt standard
labor law equal treatment
seniority pay calculation
administrative regulation validity
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 4244 k.p.c.
Art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4244 k.p.c
art. 112 k.p
art. 113 k.p
art. 9 § 2 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 5 k.p
art. 772 § 5 k.p
art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c