Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20, 2 BvL 1/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:lk20210510.2bvl000620 Generato dall'IA

Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality

Numero d'incarto 2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20, 2 BvL 1/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate) declared eleven pending constitutional review reference proceedings moot and terminated them, effectively leaving the prior Senate decision of March 25, 2021, in force. The dispute centered on the constitutionality of the Berlin Rent Cap Law (MietenWoG Bln), which was challenged in the original reference proceedings as an exercise of legislative authority. The court’s decisive legal basis was the earlier declaration that the law was incompatible with the federal constitution due to a violation of exclusive federal legislative competence in matters of social security law (Article 74(1) number 1 in conjunction with Article 72(1) of the Basic Law), rendering the subsequent reference requests under Article 100(1) sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act unnecessary.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG, § 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG, Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG; Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality: The dispute centered on the constitutionality of the Berlin Rent Cap Law (MietenWoG Bln), which was challenged in the original reference proceedings as an exercise of legislative authority. The court’s decisive legal basis was the earlier declaration that the law was incompatible with the federal constitution due to a violation of exclusive federal legislative competence in matters of social security law (Article 74(1) number 1 in conjunction with Article 72(1) of the Basic Law), rendering the subsequent reference requests under Article 100(1) sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act unnecessary.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costituzionalità competenza legislativa sindacato giurisdizionale procedura pendente oggetto della lite rinvio pregiudiziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG

Cited as the legal basis for declaring the pending constitutional review proceedings moot.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Feststellung der Erledigung mehrerer Richtervorlagen zur Verfassungsmäßigkeit des "Berliner Mietendeckels" infolge Senatsbeschlusses vom 25.03.2021, 2 BvF 1/20

[TENOR]

Die Verfahren 2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20 und 2 BvL 1/21 werden zur gemeinsamen Entscheidung verbunden.

Die Verfahren haben sich erledigt.

[GRUENDE]

Mit Beschluss vom 25. März 2021 - 2 BvF 1/20 u.a. - hat der Zweite Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts das Gesetz zur Mietenbegrenzung im Wohnungswesen in Berlin (MietenWoG Bln) in der Fassung des Art. 1 des Gesetzes zur Neuregelung gesetzlicher Vorschriften zur Mietenbegrenzung vom 11. Februar 2020 (Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für Berlin vom 22. Februar 2020, S. 50) für mit Art. 74 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar und nichtig erklärt (§ 31 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG). Damit haben sich die im Tenor genannten Richtervorlagen gemäß Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG erledigt.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.