Recusal requests targeting non-chamber judges; dispensation with reasoned rejection under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court rejected the applicants' constitutional complaints and dismissed their applications for the recusal of a judge as inadmissible, resulting in a final and unappealable decision against the complainants. The case involved ten consolidated constitutional complaints accompanied by recusal requests targeting specific members of the Federal Constitutional Court. The Court held that recusal requests concerning judges who are not members of the chamber responsible for the case do not require a decision, and it dispensed with a further substantive justification under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, thereby denying the applicants' claims.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Recusal requests targeting non-chamber judges; dispensation with reasoned rejection under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG: The case involved ten consolidated constitutional complaints accompanied by recusal requests targeting specific members of the Federal Constitutional Court. The Court held that recusal requests concerning judges who are not members of the chamber responsible for the case do not require a decision, and it dispensed with a further substantive justification under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, thereby denying the applicants' claims.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural basis cited to justify the decision to dispense with a further substantive reasoning for the rejection of the constitutional complaints.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung - Zurückweisung von Ablehnungsgesuchen
[TENOR]
Die Ablehnungsgesuche in den Verfahren 1 BvR 2133/18 und 1 BvR 2483/18 gegen die Richterin Baer werden als unzulässig verworfen.
Die Verfassungsbeschwerden werden nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
[GRUENDE]
Soweit das Ablehnungsgesuch Richterinnen und Richter des Bundesverfassungsgerichts betrifft, die nicht Mitglieder der geschäftsplanmäßig zur Entscheidung berufenen Kammer sind, bedarf es keiner Entscheidung (vgl. BVerfGE 131, 239 ; 133, 377 ).
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.