Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II PK 302/08 Généré par l'IA

Cassation appeal dismissed; Supreme Court held previous judgment binds parties regarding indefinite-term employment status.

Numéro de cause II PK 302/08
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against a lower court's order to reinstate the employee under previous conditions. The employee had previously been bound by a final judgment restoring him to his former position, which the Supreme Court interpreted as establishing an indefinite-term employment contract. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied Article 365 of the Civil Procedure Code, noting that the binding force of a judgment extends to the specific legal norm established therein, even if the reasoning is not fully explicit in the operative part.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 366 k.p.c.: A final judgment binds parties and courts to the specific legal norm established therein, requiring interpretation of the operative part in light of the reasoning to determine the scope of binding force.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
binding force of judgment indefinite term employment reinstatement to work civil procedure code scope of res judicata interpretation of judgment change of employment terms

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 366 k.p.c.
Art. 30 § 4 k.p.
Art. 42 § 1 k.p.
Art. 48 k.p.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 42 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 38 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet