Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UK 98/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court quashes social security fine ruling, requiring proof of fault in non-payment.

Numéro de cause II UK 98/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision imposing an additional fine on a state-owned construction company for unpaid social security contributions. The lower courts had dismissed the fine based on the company's poor financial situation and lack of intent to evade payment. The Supreme Court ruled that the additional fine is a disciplinary sanction requiring proof of the payer's fault, which the second-instance court failed to establish regarding the specific causes of non-payment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; The imposition of an additional fine for non-payment of social security contributions requires the court to establish the payer's fault in the non-payment, not merely the existence of formal prerequisites.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
social security contributions additional fine fault requirement disciplinary sanction non-payment liability appellate review financial solvency

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 39813 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 316 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
II UKN 555/97
Supreme Court allows disability pension granted retroactively when insurance conditions met after initial denial decision.
II UK 395/03
Social court dismissed appeal; pension eligibility conditions must be met at the time of the decision.
I UK 152/04
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; medical expert opinion proves claimant remains capable of work.
II UK 403/03
Supreme Court allows appeal, ruling social fund decisions on extra fees require substantive and purposeful judicial review.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet