II UK 403/03
Généré par l'IA
Supreme Court allows appeal, ruling social fund decisions on extra fees require substantive and purposeful judicial review.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the social insurance fund's appeal against a lower court decision that exempted a company from an additional fee. The fund argued the decision was merely a formal check on payment status, but the court held that Article 24 of the Social Insurance Act mandates a review of the fee's substantive validity and purpose. Consequently, the court ruled that imposing such fees on insolvent entities lacks public interest and violates the principle of proportionality.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 83 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy; Art. 393 k.p.c.: Decisions on additional fees are subject to full judicial control regarding substantive validity and purpose, not just formal prerequisites.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
additional social insurance fee
judicial review scope
public interest requirement
proportionality principle
social insurance law
insolvency protection
substantive validity
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 24 ust. 1 of the Social Insurance Act
Art. 83 ust. 1 pkt 3 of the Social Insurance Act
Art. 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 180 k.p
art. 7 k.p
art. 39312 k.p.c