Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I UK 41/05 Généré par l'IA

Court dismissed early retirement claim because specific work tasks were not listed in the official government annexes.

Numéro de cause I UK 41/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed Ryszard S.'s appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's refusal of early retirement benefits. The insured claimed he worked in special conditions at a steelworks, but the court found his specific tasks did not match the detailed list of eligible jobs in the Ministry of Internal Affairs' annexes. Consequently, the court ruled that resort orders cannot expand the scope of eligible work beyond the statutory annexes, leading to the dismissal of the claim.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 32 ust. 1, 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: Work performed in special conditions entitling to early retirement must strictly correspond to the positions listed in the official annexes to the relevant government regulation; resort orders cannot expand this scope.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
early retirement benefits special working conditions government regulation annexes social insurance institution resort order authority statutory interpretation employment status

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 32 ust. 1, 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r. w sprawie wieku emerytalnego pracowników zatrudnionych w szczególnych warunkach lub w szczególnym charakterze
art. 93 ust. 2 Konstytucji
art. 39315 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I UK 15/04
Supreme Court dismissed pension appeal when employment certificate listed a job not on the official special conditions list.
II UK 337/03
Supreme Court remands pension case to lower court regarding special work conditions verification. The court upheld the legal basis of the ministerial order defining special work conditions. The court clarified that the specific job title matters more than the work performed. The court emphasized the need for comprehensive evidence evaluation in pension disputes. The court ruled that the ministerial order remains valid despite constitutional transition periods. The court stated that the law defines special work conditions, not the order itself. The court noted that the order serves as a list of jobs, not a source of individual rights. The court found that the lower court must verify the actual work performed by the applicant. The court held that the applicant failed to prove special work conditions for early retirement.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet