Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20, 2 BvL 1/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:lk20210510.2bvl000620 Généré par l'IA

Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality

Numéro de cause 2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20, 2 BvL 1/21
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate) declared eleven pending constitutional review reference proceedings moot and terminated them, effectively leaving the prior Senate decision of March 25, 2021, in force. The dispute centered on the constitutionality of the Berlin Rent Cap Law (MietenWoG Bln), which was challenged in the original reference proceedings as an exercise of legislative authority. The court’s decisive legal basis was the earlier declaration that the law was incompatible with the federal constitution due to a violation of exclusive federal legislative competence in matters of social security law (Article 74(1) number 1 in conjunction with Article 72(1) of the Basic Law), rendering the subsequent reference requests under Article 100(1) sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act unnecessary.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG, § 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG, Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG; Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality: The dispute centered on the constitutionality of the Berlin Rent Cap Law (MietenWoG Bln), which was challenged in the original reference proceedings as an exercise of legislative authority. The court’s decisive legal basis was the earlier declaration that the law was incompatible with the federal constitution due to a violation of exclusive federal legislative competence in matters of social security law (Article 74(1) number 1 in conjunction with Article 72(1) of the Basic Law), rendering the subsequent reference requests under Article 100(1) sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act unnecessary.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
constitutionnalité compétence législative contrôle juridictionnel procédure pendante objet du litige renvoi préjudiciel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG
1 in Verbindung mit Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar und nichtig erklärt (§ 31 Abs.
§ 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG
Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG
Cited as the legal basis for declaring the pending constitutional review proceedings moot.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
2 BvF 1/20
Berlin rent cap statute void for encroaching on federal exclusive competence over civil law
2 BvL 6/20
Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality
2 BvL 7/20
Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality
2 BvL 8/20
Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality
2 BvL 9/20
Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality
2 BvL 10/20
Mootness of constitutional review references following declaration of rent cap law's unconstitutionality
Généré par l'IA
2 BvL 2/21
Mootness of constitutional reference to Berlin rent control law following declaration of federal legislative incompatibility
2 BvF 1/20, 2 BvL 4/20, 2 BvL 5/20
Berlin rent cap statute void for encroaching on federal exclusive competence over civil law
1 BvR 487/20, 1 BvR 515/20, 1 BvR 623/20, 1 BvR 972/20, 1 BvR 1088/20, 1 BvR 1290/20, 1 BvR 1450/20, 1 BvR 1571/20, 1 BvR 1622/20, 1 BvR 1648/20, 1 BvR 1711/20, 1 BvR 1720/20, 1 BvR 1761/20, 1 BvR 1762/20, 1 BvR 1763/20, 1 BvR 1891/20, 1 BvR 2046/20, 1 BvR 2111/20, 1 BvR 2737/20, 1 BvR 19/21, 1 BvR 366/21
Berlin Rent Cap Act: Loss of interest in constitutional complaints following prior declaration of unconstitutionality for lack of legislative competence
1 BvL 2/19
Inadmissibility of reference on constitutionality of rent cap provisions due to deficient substantiation of unconstitutionality
1 BvL 4/19
Unconstitutionality of the "Mietpreisbremse" rent cap under the Equality Clause and Ulterior Limitation Doctrine

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG

Cited as the legal basis for declaring the pending constitutional review proceedings moot.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Feststellung der Erledigung mehrerer Richtervorlagen zur Verfassungsmäßigkeit des "Berliner Mietendeckels" infolge Senatsbeschlusses vom 25.03.2021, 2 BvF 1/20

[TENOR]

Die Verfahren 2 BvL 6/20, 2 BvL 7/20, 2 BvL 8/20, 2 BvL 9/20, 2 BvL 10/20, 2 BvL 13/20, 2 BvL 21/20, 2 BvL 22/20, 2 BvL 23/20, 2 BvL 24/20 und 2 BvL 1/21 werden zur gemeinsamen Entscheidung verbunden.

Die Verfahren haben sich erledigt.

[GRUENDE]

Mit Beschluss vom 25. März 2021 - 2 BvF 1/20 u.a. - hat der Zweite Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts das Gesetz zur Mietenbegrenzung im Wohnungswesen in Berlin (MietenWoG Bln) in der Fassung des Art. 1 des Gesetzes zur Neuregelung gesetzlicher Vorschriften zur Mietenbegrenzung vom 11. Februar 2020 (Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für Berlin vom 22. Februar 2020, S. 50) für mit Art. 74 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 72 Abs. 1 GG unvereinbar und nichtig erklärt (§ 31 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 13 Nr. 11 BVerfGG). Damit haben sich die im Tenor genannten Richtervorlagen gemäß Art. 100 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GG erledigt.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.