Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 359/06 AI generated

Contract penalty assessment must reference total penalty amount, not monthly installment, under Polish Civil Code. Dismissed appeal regarding excessive penalty in non-compete agreement.

Case Number II PK 359/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially overturned the appellate court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for a contract penalty. The plaintiff argued the penalty was excessive, while the defendant contended the monthly installment was the relevant metric. The court ruled that the assessment of an excessive penalty must be based on the total agreed sum, not the monthly payment, as the penalty compensates for the general loss of the creditor's interest.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1012 § 1 i 3 k.p.; Art. 484 § 2 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.: The assessment of whether a contractual penalty is excessively high must be based on the total amount established in the agreement, rather than the monthly installment.

Keywords

AI generated
contractual penalty assessment excessive penalty clause non-compete agreement total penalty amount monthly installment payment Polish Civil Code general loss compensation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1012 § 1 k.p.
Art. 1012 § 3 k.p.
Art. 484 § 2 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 484 § 2 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 5 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text