Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 196/04 AI generated

Supreme Court allows contractual penalty in non-compete agreement despite employer's failure to pay monthly compensation.

Case Number I PK 196/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland allowed the cassation appeal, remanding the case for a new trial on the issue of whether a contractual penalty applies. The lower court dismissed the claim because it failed to examine if the employer's failure to pay monthly compensation allowed the employee to terminate the non-compete obligation. The Court ruled that the employer's delay in paying compensation did not automatically release the employee from the penalty clause for working for a competitor.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1012 k.p.; Art. 483 k.c.: A contractual penalty may be stipulated in a non-compete agreement, and the employer's failure to pay monthly compensation does not automatically release the former employee from the obligation to pay the penalty for violating the non-compete clause.

Keywords

AI generated
non-compete agreement contractual penalty failure to pay compensation termination of obligation labor law dispute cassation appeal employer liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1012 k.p.
Art. 483 k.c.
Art. 393 § 13 k.p.c.
art. 1012 k.p
art. 483 k.c
art. 1011 k.p
art. 471 k.c
art. 1012 § 2 k.p
art. 488 § 2 k.c
art. 300 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text