I PKN 429/99
AI generated
Labor dispute dismissed: missing appeal deadline not excused by false hope of continued employment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a failed reinstatement claim. The lower courts found the plaintiff missed the appeal deadline by over a month, despite her manager initially suggesting potential continued employment. The court ruled that such temporary assurances do not justify missing statutory deadlines, as they do not constitute a valid reason for delay.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 30 § 3, § 4, § 5 KP; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: Failure to file an appeal within the statutory period is not excused by a worker's mistaken belief that employment will continue, even if management previously offered such hope.
Keywords
AI generated
labor dispute
termination of contract
appeal deadline
reinstatement claim
cassation appeal
employee rights
statutory period
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 30 § 3, § 4, § 5 KP
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC