Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 55/94 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal; employer discussions on new role exclude employee's fault for missing legal deadline.

Case Number I PRN 55/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside lower court rulings that dismissed the employee's claim for reinstatement due to a missed filing deadline. The employee argued that the employer's discussions regarding a potential transfer to another position caused the delay, while the employer contended the employee was at fault for missing the statutory time limit. The court ruled that such discussions by management could constitute a valid excuse for the delay if they were genuine and relied upon by the employee.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 264 k.p.; Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; The court must assess whether circumstances cited by a party can justify a procedural delay, and an employee's reliance on employer-initiated discussions about alternative employment may exclude fault for missing a filing deadline.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural delay labor law union protection fault exclusion reinstatement claim employer discussions statutory deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 264 k.p.
Art. 265 k.p.
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
art. 264 k.p
art. 265 k.p
art. 264 § 2 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text