Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 21/94 AI generated

Supreme Court allows extension of statute of limitations for labor dispute due to employee's lack of fault and legal inexperience.

Case Number I PRN 21/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside lower court rulings that dismissed an employee's claim for reinstatement due to a missed filing deadline. The employee argued he was not at fault for missing the 14-day limit because of incorrect legal advice and attempts at out-of-court settlement. The court held that the law does not specify a strict form for requesting a deadline extension and requires a subjective assessment of the employee's knowledge and circumstances, finding the lower courts' rigid approach erroneous.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 k.p.: The absence of fault in missing a short limitation period must be assessed subjectively based on the employee's education and experience, allowing extensions for minor delays caused by legal misinformation or settlement attempts.

Keywords

AI generated
labor dispute statute of limitations missed deadline employee fault reinstatement claim subjective assessment legal inexperience

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 k.p.
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 265 k.p
art. 264 k.p
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III PZP 8/86

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text