935.51
LVLJAR
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 26 LOI d'application de la loi fédérale du 29 septembre 2017 sur les jeux d'argent (LVLJAr) - Retrait de l'autorisation
Chapitre X
Art. 26 LVLJAr · Retrait de l'autorisation
1. L'autorité compétente retire une autorisation de jeu de petite envergure lorsque
a. la sécurité et l'ordre publics l'exigent ;
b. les conditions d'octroi de l'autorisation ne sont plus remplies ;
c. le titulaire de l'autorisation ne s'acquitte plus des émoluments dus ;
d. le titulaire de l'autorisation l'a obtenue par de fausses déclarations ;
e. le titulaire de l'autorisation contrevient à ses obligations de façon grave ou répétée ;
f. le titulaire de l'autorisation a enfreint de façon grave ou répétée les législations fédérale, cantonale ou communale relatives aux jeux d'argent.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (13)
VWBES.2024.125 · so (Art. 26 Abs. 1 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz, VRG, BGS 124.11)
COVID-19 Grant Repayment Upheld Due to Dividend Payment
Cited in the reasoning to explain the parties' duty to cooperate in establishing the facts, relevant to the lack of proof for self-initiated repayment.
VWBES.2023.371 · so (§ 26 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG, BGS 124.11))
Inmate Vocational Training Reimbursement Appeal Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the duty of cooperation regarding the submission of evidence.
V 2023 111 · zg (§ 26 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG; BGS 162.1))
Contract Award Challenge: Evaluation Review and File Access Granted Contingent on Security Deposit
This provision allows the court to require an advance payment of costs from the initiating party.
V 2023 116 · zg (§ 26 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG; BGS 162.1))
Bidder Exclusion for Missing BIM Cost in Fee Proposal Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for the court's power to require the appellant to pay a deposit (Kostenakonto) for the procedure to continue.
VWBES.2022.378 · so (§ 26 Abs. 1 und § 56 Abs. 1 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRG, BGS 124.11) i.V.m. Art. 160 ff. Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO, SR 272))
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Mobile Phone Mast Permit Approval
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's duty to cooperate in proving locus standi (though the final decision addressed admissibility based on residency/workplace location).
VWBES.2022.364 · so (§ 26 des Strassengesetzes (BGS 725.11))
Local Authority v. Cantonal Road Authority Regarding Manhole Inspection Fees
This provision defines the basis for charging a fee for use exceeding the general public usage, which is the core issue regarding the imposed fee.
VWBES.2022.1 · so (§ 26 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz, VRG, BGS 124.11)
Employment Permit Appeal Dismissed Due to Sham Recruitment
Cited as the legal basis for the applicant's duty to substantiate their claims, which was not fulfilled regarding the required Russian language skills.
V 2021 93 · zg (§ 26 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG; BGS 162.1))
Challenge to Biogas Plant Award Decision: Revocation of Suspensive Effect
This provision is cited as the basis for requiring the appealing party to pay a procedural deposit.
V 2021 64 · zg (§ 26 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG; BGS 162.1))
Bid Exclusion for Material Deviation from IT Service Requirements
This provision forms the basis for ordering the payment of costs, referenced in order 4 regarding the cost deposit.
V 2020 39 · zg (§ 26 Gesetz über den Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungssachen (VRG; BGS 162.1))
Contract Award Review: Evaluation Discretion and Standing
This provision was cited as the legal basis for requiring the appellant to pay a cost deposit, failing which the proceedings would be discontinued (point 3 of the dispositive).
V 2019 104 · zg (§ 26 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (BGS 162.1))
Procurement Exclusion Upheld for Failure to Submit Main Offer with Variant
This article is the basis for the court's power to request a cost deposit from the initiating party.
A/1694/2014 · ge (art. 26 al. 1 LGD)
Waste Disposal Permit Revocation Appeal on Grounds of Persistent Non-Compliance and Subsequent Remediation
The court's decision is based on the confirmation (by the lower court) of the withdrawal of the operating authorization, which is provided for in this article for serious or repeated violations of the LGD or decisions.
Verwaltung ARGVP 1988 1051 · ar (Art. 26 Abs. 2 der Kantonsverfassung (bGS 111.1))
Reliance on Incorrect Municipal Tax Assurance Insufficient for Binding Effect
Cited as the legal provision establishing the maximum rate for the property transfer tax, which was used to argue that the tax rate stated in the erroneous information was obviously incorrect.