913.11
LAF
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 66 LOI sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - Annulation [ 8 ]
Titre IV, Chapitre II, Section VII
Art. 66 LAF · Annulation [ 8 ]
1. Si l'admission de réclamations apporte des modifications importantes au projet mis à l'enquête, la commission de classification peut annuler l'enquête pour tout ou partie du périmètre intéressé et soumettre un projet revisé à une nouvelle enquête.
2. De même, si l'admission de recours apporte des modifications importantes au projet de la commission de classification, l'autorité de recours peut annuler l'enquête sur tout ou partie du périmètre et ordonner à la commission de classification de revoir son projet pour une nouvelle mise à l'enquête.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (23)
AF.2009.0001 · vd (art. 66 de la loi du 29 novembre 1961 sur les améliorations foncières (LAF; RSV 913.11))
Land Improvement Syndicate Cost-Sharing Key Challenge Following Cadastral Reorganization
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 1) as the procedural basis for annulling the inquiry into the cost allocation key, which leads to the main order of annulment (Order III).
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited again in the reasoning leading to the dispositive to justify the annulment of the inquiry.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited as the legal basis for annulling the inquiry on the cost allocation key due to significant modifications resulting from the appeal's admission.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited as the legal justification for annulling the contested decision.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited as the legal justification for annulling the inquiry.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited implicitly in order I and II concerning the admission and annulment of the contested decision.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited implicitly in order III which annuls the inquiry on the cost allocation key.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited implicitly in order IV concerning costs.
AF.2009.0002 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appellant v. Classification Commission: Land Improvement Cost Allocation and Acquired Rights
Cited implicitly in order V concerning costs.
AF.2009.0003 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Property Owner Appeal on Land Improvement Cost-Sharing Key
The appeal was admitted because the modification of the cost key due to considering vested rights and the non-double-counting of value increases for road works constitutes an important modification requiring the cancellation of the entire cost key inquiry.
AF.2001.0005 · vd (art. 66 LAF)
Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Exchange Valuation)
This provision, governing the cancellation of the inquiry, is cited and discussed as the basis for the commission's future decision.
AF.2001.0005 · vd (art. 66 al. 1 LAF)
Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Exchange Valuation)
The court refers to the power explicitly granted to the classification commission under this article to decide on the scope of canceling the inquiry.
AF.2001.0008 · vd (Art. 66 al. 2 LAF)
Appeal Against Land Readjustment and Easement Allocation Decision
The court refers to the decision on the cancellation of the inquiry, which is linked to the procedure governed by Art. 66 al. 2 LAF, when deciding to remit the issue to the commission.
AF.1999.0010 · vd (art. 66 LAF)
Land Consolidation Appeal Rejection: Real Equalization and Pedestrian Servitude Upheld
Cited to justify refusing to order a new public inquiry, as the modifications made did not constitute important changes to the project.
AF.1998.0008 · vd (Art. 66 LAF)
Appeal Against Right-of-Way Servitude and Municipal Authorization Annulled Due to Flawed Process and Unspecified Redevelopment Plans
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for re-examining the public works project due to significant modifications, which leads to the annulment of the public inquiry in the dispositive (Order III).