913.11 LAF

CH-VD

Art. 114 LOI sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - [ 6, 12 ]

Titre VI, Chapitre IV

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (139 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 114 LAF · [ 6, 12 ]

1. Le département [I] exige le remboursement total ou partiel des subventions cantonales et fédérales accordées à titre d'améliorations foncières, et les communes les subventions qu'elles ont versées, pendant vingt ans à partir du versement des dernières subventions

a. lorsqu'un bien-fonds est morcelé;

b. lorsqu'un bien-fonds ou un bâtiment est soustrait à la destination pour laquelle les subventions ont été octroyées;

c. lorsqu'un bâtiment est revendu avec bénéfice;

d. en cas de non-respect d'une condition de subventionnement.

← Art. 113 LAF sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - But [ 12, 14, 20 ] Art. 115 LAF →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (8)

AF.2010.0002 · vd (Art. 114 LAF)

Appeal on Reimbursement of Land Improvement Subsidies After Conversion of Agricultural Barn

This provision was cited by the administrative authority as the basis for demanding the reimbursement of subsidies, which the court ultimately annulled.

AF.2010.0002 · vd (art. 114 al. 1 LAF)

Appeal on Reimbursement of Land Improvement Subsidies After Conversion of Agricultural Barn

Cited in the legal analysis regarding the requirement to repay subsidies upon removal from the designated purpose.

AF.2001.0010 · vd (art. 114 lit. b LAF)

Property Owner v. Land Improvement Association: Cost Apportionment and Subsidy Restitution in Land Development and Quarry Extraction

The court annulled the decision ordering the restitution of subsidies based on the reasoning that the land was not 'withdrawn from the destination' for which subsidies were granted.

AF.1994.0015 · vd (Art. 114 lit. b LAF)

Chalet Subsidy Reimbursement Appeal on Agricultural Use Precedent

Although the article defines the cantonal obligation to repay subsidies if the building is diverted from its original purpose, the decision ruled that this condition was not met, leading to the annulment of the cantonal subsidy repayment.

AF.2004.0001 · vd (Art. 114 lit. b LAF)

Equestrian Facility Subsidy Restitution Dispute

The court did not find that the property was withdrawn from the destination for which subsidies were granted, leading to the annulment of the decision regarding cantonal subsidies.

AF.1992.0328 · vd (Art. 114 LAF)

Appeal Against Land Improvement Subsidy Reimbursement Dismissed Due to Prescription Period

Although the court ultimately ruled based on prescription, this article was cited in the reasoning to establish the cantonal competence regarding subsidy reimbursement, which would have been the basis had the claim not been time-barred.

AF.1992.0304 · vd (Art. 114 LAF)

Land Readjustment Subsidy Restitution Liability on Subsequent Purchaser Upheld

Although cited in the reasoning regarding the department's power to demand reimbursement, this specific article (along with federal provisions) established the context for the subsidy repayment obligation which was the core subject of the dispute, leading to the annulment of the decision.

AF.1991.0031 · vd (art. 114 LAF)

Heirs' Appeal of Subsidy Restitution After Land Subdivision

This provision mandates the repayment of federal and cantonal subsidies in cases such as land parcelling, which is the core subject of the reform imposed in the operative part.