819.31.1
RPAC
CH-VD
Art. 27 RÈGLEMENT de prévention des accidents dus aux chantiers (RPAC) - Hélicoptères
Chapitre VI
Art. 27 RPAC · Hélicoptères
1. L'engagement d'un hélicoptère est soumis à l'autorisation de l'organe de contrôle.
2. L'autorisation n'est donnée qu'en l'absence d'autres moyens techniques dont la mise en oeuvre puisse raisonnablement être exigée d'après les circonstances.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (8)
AC.2006.0003 · vd (art. 27 RPAC)
Municipality v. Cantonal Authority (Skate Park Construction in Protected Waterway Corridor)
This provision was cited by the SAT in its refusal, and the court confirmed the SAT's rejection of the authorization under this ground.
AC.2004.0268 · vd (art. 27 al. 1er RPAC)
Appeal Against Municipal Refusal of Building Permit for Villas
The court found the planned parking spaces contrary to this article because no convention for placing them forward of the construction limit had been established.
GE.2004.0181 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 RPAC)
Ambulance Worker Dismissal Annulled for Lack of Prior Written Warning
Cited in the reasoning when distinguishing between disciplinary responsibility and dismissal for just cause.
GE.1998.0182 · vd (Art. 27 al. 3 RPAC)
Police Officer Suspension Upheld Despite Invalidated Resignation and Retroactive Pay Cut
The court examined the statute of limitations mentioned in this provision when rejecting the appeal grounds concerning prescription.
GE.2003.0022 · vd (art. 27 RPAC)
Municipality v. Employee: Termination for Criminal Conviction Upholds Trust Requirement
Cited to define the authority of the Municipality to impose disciplinary sanctions for dereliction or intentional breach of duties.
GE.1995.0061 · vd (art. 27 et ss. RPAC)
Employee Termination Upheld Due to Absenteeism and Job Dissatisfaction Linked to Medical Condition
These articles concerning disciplinary sanctions were mentioned for context regarding the appellant's misconduct but were not the basis for the final dismissal order.
GE.1995.0029 · vd (art. 27 al. 3 RPAC)
Employee Disciplinary Transfer Time-Barred After Annulment of Prior Revocation
This article defining the prescription period for disciplinary proceedings was central to the reasoning for admitting the appeal, but it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (I-IV).
GE.1993.0010 · vd (art. 27 al. 3 RPAC)
Employee Dismissal and Unauthorized Absence Challenge
Cited in the reasoning regarding preventive suspension measures, which informed the court's decision to annul the suspension order.