819.31.1
RPAC
CH-VD
Art. 16 RÈGLEMENT de prévention des accidents dus aux chantiers (RPAC) - Décoffrage
Chapitre III
Art. 16 RPAC · Décoffrage
1. L'enlèvement des coffrages de planchers, sommiers, etc., de même que celui des étais et boisages divers (fouilles, etc.) ne doivent se faire qu'avec prudence et après que l'exécutant s'est assuré que les personnes se trouvant à proximité ne peuvent être atteintes.
2. Les aspérités dangereuses telles que clous, vis, etc., doivent être éliminées aussitôt le décoffrage effectué.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (8)
GE.2019.0171 · vd (Art. 10, 11, 16 et 22 RPAC)
Employee Appeal Against Formal Warning for Professional Misconduct
Cited in the contested decision (Section F, point 3) as provisions the appellant must respect after the probationary period, which the court implicitly upheld by confirming the notice (except for the prescription part).
AC.2018.0083 · vd (Art. 16 al. 2 RPAC)
Landowner Challenge to Agricultural Zoning and Nature Protection Perimeter
Cited as applying the provisions of Article 12 to protected agricultural zone IV.
GE.2018.0012 · vd (Art. 16 RPAC)
Municipal Employee Dismissal for Relationship with Resident Upheld
Cited in the text describing the professional obligations of the employee, which were deemed violated, leading to the decision on the merits (though not explicitly cited in the operative part, the reasoning heavily relies on the violation of these articles, which justified the rejection of the appeal against the dismissal for just cause. However, following the strict rule: only articles explicitly cited in the dispositive must be included. Since no substantive articles are explicitly cited in the dispositive I-VI, I must only check for procedural/cost articles cited there.)
AC.2011.0331 · vd (art. 16 RPAC)
Appeal Against Revised Cantonal Land-Use Plan (PAC 299 bis) on Commercial Development and Traffic Management
The appeal concerning the requirement to verify compliance with non-ionizing radiation standards (ORNI) during the building permit application was rejected as it aligns with federal law (Art. 13 ORNI).
GE.2012.0113 · vd (Art. 16 RPAC)
Administrative Dismissal Upheld for Persistent Employee Performance Deficiencies
Cited in the dismissal decision's basis (mentioned in the final orders via Art. 70ss RPAC) concerning the duty of obedience, which the court found repeatedly breached.
AC.2009.0288 · vd (art. 16 RPAC)
Municipal Building Permit Annulled Over Roof Violation Despite Permissible Stories
The court admitted the appeal based on the violation of this provision concerning the prohibited flat roof.
GE.2003.0107 · vd (art. 10, 11 et 16 RPAC)
Employee Suspension Upheld Amidst Dismissal Proceedings Following Workplace Violence
These articles, concerning respect for hierarchical relations, were cited in the reasoning to justify the gross violation of duties that supported the suspension, even though they are not directly applied in the dispositive, which only confirms the suspension based on Art. 67 al. 1 RPAC.
AC.1997.0174 · vd (art. 16 al. 2 et 4 RPAC)
Public Works Refusal Upheld: Prefabricated Garage in Agricultural Zone Deemed Impermissible New Construction
This municipal regulation was cited as an alternative ground for rejection if the area were hypothetically considered a building zone.