700.11.1
RLATC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 24 RÈGLEMENT d'application de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (RLATC) - Aménagement et entretien des bâtiments
Titre II, Chapitre I, Section I
Art. 24 RLATC · Aménagement et entretien des bâtiments
1. Les bâtiments et autres ouvrages ou installations et leurs abords doivent être aménagés et entretenus de manière à ne présenter aucun danger pour les usagers.
2. Les accès réservés aux véhicules sont conçus de manière à garantir une visibilité suffisante.
3. En principe, les escaliers sont munis d'une main-courante, qu'ils soient intérieurs ou extérieurs.
4. Les ouvertures donnant sur le vide, telles que fenêtres, balcons, escaliers ou terrasses, doivent être pourvues d'une protection suffisante.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (12)
AC.2025.0189 · vd (art. 24 al. 1 RLATC)
Property Owner v. Road Authority (Building Permit Refusal)
General requirement for garages and parking spaces to be designed, constructed, and maintained without danger to users.
AC.2025.0189 · vd (art. 24 al. 2 RLATC)
Property Owner v. Road Authority (Building Permit Refusal)
Requirement for vehicle access points to be designed to ensure sufficient visibility.
AC.2024.0012 · vd (Art. 24 al. 1 et 2 RLATC)
Municipality v. Cantonal Authority Regarding Road Access Safety Standards
These articles concerning the safety requirements for accesses were used to confirm the grounds for refusing the authorization.
AC.2022.0301 · vd (art. 24 al. 1 RLATC)
Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Multi-Unit Development Approval Despite Objections to Basement, Parking, and Landscaping
This general requirement for designing and maintaining garages to ensure user safety was mentioned in the context of assessing the ramp's compliance.
AC.2022.0301 · vd (art. 24 al. 2 RLATC)
Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Multi-Unit Development Approval Despite Objections to Basement, Parking, and Landscaping
This provision regarding sufficient visibility for vehicle accesses was mentioned in the context of assessing the ramp's exit onto the Chemin des Lupins.
AC.2022.0414 · vd (art. 24 al. 1, 2 et 4 RLATC)
Municipality's Occupancy Permit Refusal Annulled for Lack of Legal Basis and Documentation
The court indicated that future enforcement orders regarding fall protection might be based on these articles, distinguishing them from enforcement based on the original building permit conditions.
Jug.2018.37 · vd (art. 24 RLATC)
Appellant v. State: Usury by Trade and Property Offenses Appeal
Cited in the introductory section of the dispositive, regarding building maintenance standards related to the LATC conviction.
AC.2014.0320 · vd (art. 24 al. 1 du règlement d'application du 19 septembre 1986 de la loi vaudoise du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (RLATC; RSV 700.11.1))
Municipality v. Neighbors (Building Permit Parking Spaces)
General requirement that construction must not present danger to users, considered in the context of insufficient safety arguments raised by the appellants.
AC.2014.0320 · vd (art. 24 al. 2 RLATC)
Municipality v. Neighbors (Building Permit Parking Spaces)
Requirement for sufficient visibility in vehicle accesses, considered in the context of insufficient safety arguments raised by the appellants.
AC.2013.0416 · vd (Art. 24 RLATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Guardrail Installation on Garage Roof
The court confirmed the administrative order based on this article, which requires securing openings overlooking a void, like the garage roof accessible from a path.
AC.2012.0238 · vd (art. 24 al. 4 RLATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Terrace and Retaining Wall
Cited in the context of the municipality's obligation regarding safety requirements related to the matter being sent back to the municipality.
AC.2010.0219 · vd (Art. 24 RLATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Retroactive Application of Professional Standard
The municipal decision was initially referred to this article, although the court ultimately used other grounds to annul it.