270.11.6
TDC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 26 TARIF des dépens en matière civile (TDC) - Droit transitoire
Chapitre V
Art. 26 TDC · Droit transitoire
1. Le présent tarif s'applique aux procédures régies par les nouvelles dispositions fédérales et cantonales de procédure découlant de l'entrée en vigueur le 1er janvier 2011 du Code de procédure civile du 19 décembre 2008.
2. Pour les procédures soumises à l'ancien droit de procédure cantonal, la fixation des dépens est faite selon le tarif des honoraires d'avocat dus à titre de dépens du 17 juin 1986 et le tarif des honoraires d'agent d'affaires breveté dus à titre de dépens du 22 février 1972.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (84)
Jug.inc.2021.2 · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Inheritance Dispute Claim Amendment Dispute
Cited as the basis for applying the tariff for lawyers' fees in civil matters.
5.2020.JMN · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Incidental Request for Procedural Reform Granted with Cost Award
Cited as the basis for applying the specific tariff to determine the lawyer's fees awarded as costs.
2.2020.CKH · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Estate Annulment and Gift Reduction Appeal Rejected on Procedural Grounds
Cited as the basis for applying the applicable tariff for indemnity costs.
19.2019.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Plaintiff's Attempt to Introduce Late Evidence Denied; Documents Struck.
This provision applies the previous lawyers' fee tariff to determine the costs awarded as compensation.
10.2019.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Heirs of H.Z. v. Heirs of G.Z. and J.Z. (Estate Division and Financial Claims)
Cited in the reasoning for the calculation of awarded costs (Order X and XI) as the currently applicable tariff for costs.
6.2019.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Procedural Reform Denial Based on Irrelevance and Foreign Law in Mixed-Substance Case
Used as the applicable legal basis (via reference) for calculating the incidental costs awarded to the respondent.
5.2019.JMN · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Case Regarding Admissibility of Late-Filed Allegations After Expiration of Reformulation Deadlines
This article was cited as the basis for applying the abrogated Attorney Fees Tariff (aTAV) for calculating the respondent's costs.
1.2019.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Procedural Reform Denial in 2002 Traffic Accident Compensation Case
Cited as the basis for the applicability of the cantonal Tariff of Costs in Civil Matters (TDC) for determining party costs.
19.2018.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Wine Contamination Amendment Denial
Cited as the basis for applying the Cantonal Tariff for lawyers' fees (TAv) to determine the awarded costs (depenses) for the successful party.
18.2018.JMN · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Debt Collection Opposition and Sub-Expert Recusal Denial
Cited as the provision making the old cantonal legal fees tariff applicable.
11.2018.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Case Regarding Request for Supplementary Expert Report on Traumatic Brain Injury Damages
Used to determine the applicability of the former legal fee tariff (aTAv) due to the transitional rules of the new costs tariff.
39.2017.PMR · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Pleadings Regarding Defect Notice Admitted; Costs Awarded
Cited as the basis for applying the old Attorney Fee Tariff for costs.
19.2017.PMR · vd (art. 26 al. 2 du tarif des dépens en matière civile du 23 novembre 2010 [TDC])
Insurance Dispute Over Accident-Related Cognitive Impairment and Admissibility of New Expert Testimony
Cited as the basis for applying the relevant scale for calculating party costs.
7.2017.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Claimant Motion to Recuse Financial Expert Denied Due to Insufficient Appearance of Impartiality Concerns
Cited as the reason for applying the abrogated cantonal tariff (aTAv) to the attorney fees in this case.
39.2016.EKA · vd (art. 26 al. 2 TDC)
Architect Debt Claim and Inadmissible Reform Request
Used to justify the applicability of the previous lawyer's fee tariff (aTAV) based on the date of the procedure's opening.