270.11.5
TEILVITFJC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 5 TARIF des frais judiciaires civils (TFJC) - Jugement après annulation
Partie I
Art. 5 TFJC · Jugement après annulation
1. Pour le jugement d'une cause renvoyée ensuite d'un arrêt du Tribunal fédéral ou du Tribunal cantonal, il n'est pas perçu de nouvel émolument forfaitaire de décision.
2. Des frais sont perçus pour l'administration de nouvelles preuves.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (40)
462----------- · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Contract Type and Appeal Costs Reassessment After Federal Ruling
Cited to state that no new decision fee is collected for a judgment following a referral from the Federal Supreme Court.
HC.2022.187 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Inheritance Dispute and Usufructuary Debt Extinction
This provision concerns the non-collection of a new decision fee following a remand from the Federal Supreme Court, cited in the reasoning for cost application, but not in the final orders.
HC.2021.186 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Appellate Court Cost Allocation After Reversal of Rent Reduction
Cited in the dispositive (though implicitly via the reasoning section leading to order III) stating that no additional fees will be collected for the present decision.
HC.2020.476 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Child Support Recalculation and Cost Allocation After Federal Tribunal Remand
Cited in the final orders to state that no new fee will be charged for the decision following the remand.
HC.2020.296 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Employee Termination and Reduced Hours Agreement Validity Appeal
This provision confirmed that no new flat-rate fee was due for the judgment following the Federal Supreme Court's referral.
HC.2019.616 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Employee Commission Dispute and Cost Allocation
Cited in relation to the non-levy of additional fees for the present ruling.
HC.2017.955 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Spousal Support Calculation Following Remand on Tax Burden
Cited in the dispositive section regarding the non-collection of new court fees following the referral decision.
HC.2017.523 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Claim Against Court-Appointed Counsel for Missed Benefits and Prescription Period
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the exemption from a new flat-rate fee for a judgment following a Federal Tribunal referral, but not in the operative part.
Arr.t.2017.696 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Cantonal Court Remand on Provisional Child Placement Due to Parental Conflict
Cited as the basis for ruling that the second-instance decision should be rendered without judicial costs.
HC.2017.524 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Child Support Cost Allocation Following Supreme Court Remand
Cited to state that no new decision fee is charged for judging a case remanded by the Federal Tribunal.
HC.2016.1052 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Property Owners' Association v. Owner (Cost Allocation and Prior Rulings)
Applied to rule that no new fixed fee is charged for this decision following the remand from the Federal Tribunal.
27.2016.PHC · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Architectural Integrity Dispute and Cost Allocation
Cited in the reasoning for maintaining the previous judicial fees without imposing a new flat-rate fee for the decision following the Federal Tribunal's judgment.
ML.2014.73 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Denial of Justice Due to Excessive Delay in Debt Enforcement Ruling
Cited in the heading and applied in the dispositive to rule that no new decision fee should be collected for this ruling.
110.2011.PHC · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Contractor Payment Dispute: Joinder of Architect Denied on Grounds of Insufficient Recourse and Procedural Complexity
Cited as a general basis for ordering the costs of the incidental procedure.
126.2010.PHC · vd (art. 5 al. 1 TFJC)
Claimants' Attempt to Amend Pleadings to Contest Expert Report Rejected
Cited in the reasoning regarding the assessment of incidental proceeding costs.