Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
853.100 LCAMALKVGAV CH-TI

Art. 76 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal)

LCAMal
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (143 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 76 LCAMal

[160] 1 Contro le decisioni emesse in virtù della presente legge, è data facoltà di reclamo all’organo amministrativo che le ha emesse entro 30 giorni dalla notificazione. È applicabile la legge sulla procedura amministrativa del 24 settembre 2013. [161]

2 Contro le decisioni su reclamo di cui al cpv. 1, è data facoltà di ricorso al Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni entro 30 giorni dalla notificazione.

3 Contro le decisioni concernenti il rilascio dell’autorizzazione e la garanzia dell’assunzione dei costi per le ospedalizzazioni fuori Cantone non è dato reclamo e vi è la facoltà di ricorso diretto al Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni.

4 È riservato l’art. 76b.

[160] Art. modificato dalla L 17.3.2011; in vigore dal 1.1.2012 - BU 2011, 301; precedenti modifiche: BU 1999 , 41; BU 2006 , 201.

[161] Cpv. modificato dalla L 24.9.2013; in vigore dal 1.3.2014 - BU 2013, 481.

← Art. 75 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal) Art. 76a LCAMal →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (316)

36.2024.10 · ti (Art. 76 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Retroactive Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial
This procedural rule governs the right to appeal the administrative decision (decision on appeal) to the Cantonal Court of Insurance.
36.2024.4 · ti (Art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Insured Individual v. Administration on Health Insurance Premium Reduction Calculation
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction over appeals against decisions following a complaint regarding premium reductions.
36.2023.25 · ti (Art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Applicant v. Health Insurance Authority: Stable Cohabitation Determination for Premium Reduction
Cited implicitly in section 2.1 to confirm the court's procedural competence to hear the appeal against the decision made after the initial claim.
36.2022.32 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Insured Appeal of Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Based on Post-Assessment Expenses
Cited to establish the admissibility and timeliness of the appeal to the Cantonal Court of Insurance.
36.2021.23 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Insured Domicile on January 1st Determines Subsidy Competence
Cited in reasoning as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Court of Insurance.
36.2019.77 · ti (Art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Social Insurance Authority v. Applicant (2012-2016 RIPAM Reductions)
Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal against the decision on the claim.
36.2019.36 · ti (Art. 76 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Appealability of Administrative Refusal to Reconsider Mandatory Health Insurance Affiliation
Cited to discuss the initial appeal route (reclamo) against LCAMal decisions.
36.2018.51 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Administrative Appeal Untimely Due to Prior Knowledge of Health Insurance Enrollment
This provision sets the 30-day deadline for the appeal, the tardiness of which led to the rejection of the appeal.
36.2018.44 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Late Filing of Health Insurance Premium Appeal
This article established the 30-day appeal period, the violation of which led to the appeal being deemed inadmissible.
36.2018.21 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Insured Denied Waiver of Repayment for Health Insurance Subsidy Due to Failure to Disclose Cohabitation
This article governs the admissibility and procedural framework for appealing administrative decisions to the Cantonal Insurance Tribunal.
36.2018.18 · ti (Art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Spouses v. Cantonal Compensation Fund (2018 Premium Reduction)
Cited to confirm the competence of the Cantonal Insurance Tribunal to examine the appeal.
36.2018.8 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 e 2 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Revocation Upheld Due to Undisclosed Cohabitation and Income Aggregation
Cited as the basis for the Tribunal's competence to examine the appeal against the decision on appeal.
36.2017.104 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Appeal Inadmissibility Upheld Due to Deemed Notification; Case Remanded for New Assessment
Cited as the rule governing the initial claim period (30 days).
36.2017.104 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Appeal Inadmissibility Upheld Due to Deemed Notification; Case Remanded for New Assessment
Procedural rule governing the time limit for filing an appeal to the TCA against a decision on appeal.
36.2017.90 · ti (art. 76 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Affiliation Appeal Timeliness
The court based its decision on the tardiness of the appeal, which is governed by this provision regarding the deadline for appeal against decisions under LCAMal.