853.100
LCAMALKVGAV
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 45 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal)
LCAMal
Art. 45 LCAMal
[92] 1 Gli assicuratori presentano i conteggi di chiusura relativi all’applicazione della riduzione dei premi.
Il regolamento disciplina i particolari.
2 Il Consiglio di Stato fa redigere un rapporto di revisione sull’applicazione della riduzione dei premi, di regola per ogni anno civile.
[92] Art. modificato dalla L 24.6.2010; in vigore dal 1.1.2012 - BU 2010, 297; precedente modifica: BU 2008, 109.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (138)
36.2014.65 · ti (art. 45 del Reg. LCAMal)
Insurance Premium Subsidy Recalculation Denial
Referenced to indicate that compliance with cantonal regulations on application deadlines is necessary to receive the subsidy.
36.2008.109 · ti (art. 45 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Denied Health Insurance Subsidy Despite Administrative Error
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the expired deadline for filing the claim for 2008.
36.2008.109 · ti (art. 45 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Denied Health Insurance Subsidy Despite Administrative Error
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the expired deadline, which is the basis for the rejection of the appeal.
36.2007.89 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Appellant v. Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Appeal
Cited in the reasoning section to justify the rejection of the appeal based on excusable reasons, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-4.
36.2006.208 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 1 lett. a Reg. LCAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Appeal Upheld Due to Untimely Application
The appeal is rejected because the application was filed late according to this provision (deadline for ordinarily taxed insured persons).
36.2006.208 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 1 lett. d Reg. LCAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Appeal Upheld Due to Untimely Application
Cited in the reasoning regarding income comparison (diminuzione del reddito), but not used in the final orders.
36.2006.208 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 1 Reg. LCAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Appeal Upheld Due to Untimely Application
Cited in the reasoning to establish the deadline for filing the application, which is the basis for rejecting the appeal in order 1.
36.2006.208 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Appeal Upheld Due to Untimely Application
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility for the Institute to accept late applications, but not used in the final orders.
36.2006.211 · ti (art. 45 Reg. LCAMal)
Appeal Regarding Late Application for 2006 Health Insurance Subsidies
Cited in the reasoning section to establish that the appeal was late, which leads to the final rejection of the appeal (Order 1).
36.2006.219 · ti (art. 45 Reg. LCAMal)
Insurance Subsidy Application Deadline Appeal
Cited as the provision establishing the deadline that the appellant failed to meet.
36.2006.219 · ti (art. 45 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insurance Subsidy Application Deadline Appeal
Cited as the provision allowing the IAS to accept late applications for justified reasons.
36.2006.231 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 1 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Individual v. Social Insurance Office: Late Premium Reduction Application Deadline Appeal
Cited to specify the deadlines for submitting subsidy applications based on the insured person's taxation method.
36.2006.231 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Individual v. Social Insurance Office: Late Premium Reduction Application Deadline Appeal
Cited in order 11 as the rule allowing the IAS to consider requests submitted out of time for proven special reasons (though this is repeated in order 11, it appears here first conceptually).
36.2006.231 · ti (Art. 45 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Individual v. Social Insurance Office: Late Premium Reduction Application Deadline Appeal
Cited in the reasoning (and implicitly the basis for upholding the rejection) as the rule allowing the IAS to consider requests submitted out of time for proven special reasons.
36.2006.196 · ti (Art. 45 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Party v. Health Insurance Authority re Untimely Premium Reduction Application
The appeal was rejected based on the untimeliness of the request, which the court evaluated against the deadlines set in this regulation.