853.100
LCAMALKVGAV
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 35 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal)
LCAMal
Art. 35 LCAMal
[68] L’importo normativo di riduzione dei premi è determinato come segue
[ PMR - ( PMR x RD 2 ) ].
RDM 2
[68] Art. modificato dalla L 3.11.2014; in vigore dal 1.1.2015 - BU 2014, 587; precedenti modifiche: BU 2010, 297; BU 2013, 79.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (36)
36.2025.2 · ti (Art. 35 LCAMal)
Appeal Against Revision of 2024 Premium Reduction Subsidy Based on Household Status and 2021 Tax Data
Cited in the reasoning as part of the formula used to determine the normative premium reduction amount.
36.2024.4 · ti (Art. 35 LCAMal)
Insured Individual v. Administration on Health Insurance Premium Reduction Calculation
Cited to establish the formula used for determining the normative amount of the premium reduction.
36.2021.8 · ti (art. 35 LCAMal)
Applicant v. Premium Reduction Subsidy Denial
Cited to confirm the formula used to establish the final amount of the 2021 premium reduction.
36.2019.77 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Social Insurance Authority v. Applicant (2012-2016 RIPAM Reductions)
Cited concerning the income limit for maximum RIPAM reduction starting from 2013, relevant to the merit assessment.
36.2018.8 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Revocation Upheld Due to Undisclosed Cohabitation and Income Aggregation
Cited in relation to the limit for determining the maximum normative reduction amount for the period 2012-2014.
36.2017.3 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Insured Persons Appeal Recalculated Premium Reductions Based on Undisclosed Cohabitation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the income limit threshold for maximum premium reduction applicable in 2013.
36.2016.129 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Claimants v. Compensation Fund: Health Insurance Premium Reduction Retroactive Revocation Based on Cohabitation Status
Cited in reasoning regarding the reference income limit applicable for the maximum subsidy determination for 2013, specifically noting its prior modification.
36.2016.137 · ti (art. 35 LCAMal)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing and Substantive Meritlessness in Health Insurance Premium Reduction Dispute
Cited in the reasoning specifying the formula used to calculate the normative amount of the premium reduction.
36.2016.54 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Social Security Premium Reduction Revocation Upheld Due to Stable Cohabitation and Income Aggregation
Cited regarding the reference income limit for the maximum benefit before the 2015 changes.
36.2015.80 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Recalculation of Health Insurance Subsidies Based on Undisclosed Cohabitation
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the change in the income limit for maximum RIPAM starting in 2013.
36.2014.93 · ti (Art. 35 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Appeal Based on Earnings Calculation
This article, referenced in reasoning 2.22 for calculating the income threshold, was implicitly used in the final calculation.
36.2014.6 · ti (art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Taxpayer Appeal: Property Value Attribution Following Habitation Right Establishment
Cited in reasoning 2.13 to establish the income limit for maximum premium reduction, although the final order does not explicitly rely on this article for the final ruling.
36.2014.8 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Compensation Fund (2013 Premium Reduction Calculation)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the income limit, but the final order does not explicitly cite it as the basis for the ruling.
36.2013.28 · ti (Art. 35 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Appellant v. Health Insurance Fund on Premium Subsidy Calculation
The court considered the literal text of this article, which extends the maximum RIPAM limit up to the full Laps need threshold for 2013, as interpreted in conjunction with Art. 36 LCAMal based on legislative intent.
36.2012.71 · ti (Art. 35 alla lettera a) LCAMal)
Insurance Premium Reduction Appeal Based on Recalculated Disposable Income
Cited in the reasoning to determine the percentage of excess income that must be borne by the insured for married persons without children.