Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
853.100 LCAMALKVGAV CH-TI

Art. 31 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal)

LCAMal
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (143 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 31 LCAMal

[57] 1 Il reddito disponibile di riferimento (RD) è costituito dei seguenti parametri

a) RL Reddito lordo (somma di tutti i redditi dell’unità di riferimento secondo la legge tributaria del 21 giugno 1994 [di seguito: LT]);

b) qSOST Quota parte sostanza (=1/15 sostanza netta secondo LT);

c) PMR Premio medio di riferimento dell’anno di competenza, con franchigia ordinaria e rischio di infortunio incluso;

d) CS Contributi sociali obbligatori (AVS, AI, IPG, AD, AINP, LPP; secondo LT);

e) ALIM Pensioni alimentari pagate (per figli ed ex-coniuge, secondo LT);

f) SPPROF Spese professionali per salariati (secondo LT) [massimo 4'000 CHF/anno per UR];

g) SPINT Spese per interessi passivi privati e aziendali (secondo LT) [massimo 3'000 CHF/anno per UR].

2 Esso è stabilito come segue

RD = [RL + qSOST] - [PMR + CS + ALIM + SPPROF + SPINT].

3 Il reddito disponibile di riferimento è determinato dalla somma dei parametri accertati per l’unità di riferimento considerata.

4 Se il reddito disponibile di riferimento è inferiore allo zero, esso equivale a zero. [58]

[57] Art. modificato dalla L 24.6.2010; in vigore dal 1.1.2012 - BU 2010, 297; precedenti modifiche: BU 2007, 110; BU 2010, 46.

[58] Cpv. introdotto dalla L 3.11.2014; in vigore dal 1.1.2015 - BU 2014, 587.

← Art. 30a LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal) Art. 32 LCAMal →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (270)

36.2022.32 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Insured Appeal of Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Based on Post-Assessment Expenses
This article, listing deductible expenses, is cited implicitly as the basis for rejecting additional deductions claimed by the appellant.
36.2022.32 · ti (art. 31 cpv. 1 lettere c) – g) LCAMal)
Insured Appeal of Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Based on Post-Assessment Expenses
Cited in the reasoning to support the conclusion that the list of deductible expenses is exhaustive.
36.2020.20 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Insured Party v. Health Insurance Authority Regarding Premium Reduction Calculation
Cited in the reasoning to define available income and specify the deductible expenses for calculating the available income.
36.2020.18 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Insured's Appeal of Mandatory Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Upheld on Available Income Calculation
Cited in the reasoning to specify the exhaustive list of admissible deductions when determining disposable income (RDS).
36.2019.77 · ti (Art. 31 LCAMal)
Social Insurance Authority v. Applicant (2012-2016 RIPAM Reductions)
Cited to define the available income (reddito disponibile), which is key to the rejection of the appeal on the merits.
36.2019.52 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Health Insurance Reduction Recalculation)
Cited when discussing the exhaustive list of deductible expenses, although the core decision was based on the incorrect application of income determination rules (Art. 30 LCAMal / Art. 14 Reg.LCAMal).
36.2019.52 · ti (art. 31 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Health Insurance Reduction Recalculation)
Cited extensively regarding deductible expenses, but the core decision overturned the calculation method, not the interpretation of deductions.
36.2019.52 · ti (art. 31 lett. e LCAMal)
Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Health Insurance Reduction Recalculation)
Cited when listing deductible expenses (alimony), but not in the final orders.
36.2019.52 · ti (art. 31 lett. f LCAMal)
Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Health Insurance Reduction Recalculation)
Cited when listing deductible expenses (professional expenses), but not in the final orders.
36.2019.52 · ti (art. 31 lett. g LCAMal)
Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Health Insurance Reduction Recalculation)
Cited when listing deductible expenses (interest paid), but not in the final orders.
36.2018.76 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Insured Denied Health Insurance Premium Reduction Despite Father's Death
Cited to define the available income (reddito disponibile) and list the exhaustive admissible deductions.
36.2018.8 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Revocation Upheld Due to Undisclosed Cohabitation and Income Aggregation
Defines the disposable income (Reddito disponibile).
36.2018.2 · ti (Art. 31 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Upheld on Income Calculation and Reference Unit Composition
The court relied on the exhaustive list of deductions in this article to uphold the Cassa's calculation of available income.
36.2017.49 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Recalculation Due to Undisclosed Cohabitant and Student Dependent
Cited in the reasoning defining the disposable income (reddito disponibile) and allowed deductions.
36.2017.43 · ti (art. 31 LCAMal)
Insured Property Wealth vs. Disposable Income for Premium Reduction
The court applies the definition of available income (reddito disponibile) based on this article, even if the appeal is rejected.