853.100
LCAMALKVGAV
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 20 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal)
LCAMal
Art. 20 LCAMal
[11] Il Consiglio di Stato designa l’autorità competente conformemente alla legislazione federale in materia di assicurazione obbligatoria delle cure medico-sanitarie.
[11] Art. reintrodotto dalla L 14.12.2011; in vigore dal 1.1.2012 - BU 2012, 49; precedenti modifiche: BU 2007, 661; BU 2009, 98; BU 2010, 49.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)
36.2005.194 · ti (Art. 20 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Health Insurance Benefits
Cited in the reasoning to establish the competent social assistance authority, relevant to the procedural fault identified.
36.2006.50 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Insured v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Benefits Over Unpaid Arrears
This provision, regarding the cantonal designation of social assistance authority, was cited in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive.
36.2006.50 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Insured v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Benefits Over Unpaid Arrears
This provision, regarding the scope of application of Art. 20 para. 1 LCAMal, was cited in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive.
36.2006.50 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 3 LCAMal)
Insured v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Benefits Over Unpaid Arrears
This provision, regarding the application of premium reduction subsidies, was cited in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive.
36.2005.186 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Health Benefits Due to Premium Arrears
Cited in the reasoning to describe the cantonal designation of the social assistance authority for recovering unrecoverable claims.
36.2005.186 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 2 LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Health Benefits Due to Premium Arrears
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of application of Art. 20 para. 1 LCAMal.
36.2005.186 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 3 LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Sickness Fund: Suspension of Health Benefits Due to Premium Arrears
Cited in the reasoning regarding the application of the premium reduction subsidy before payment of unrecoverable claims.
36.2003.45 · ti (art. 20 LCAMal)
Mootness of Appeal Regarding Health Insurance Premium Responsibility and Double Coverage
Cited in the reasoning by the IAS regarding the canton's responsibility to pay arrears if the insured has default certificates, although this article itself is not repeated in the dispositive orders (1-3).
36.2001.51 · ti (art. 20 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Spousal Joint Liability for Health Insurance Premiums Despite Separation of Assets
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the designation of social assistance authority for unrecoverable claims.
36.1999.152 · ti (art. 20 LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Health Insurance Fund: Offset of Medical Benefits Against Premiums
The court mentioned that this article shields the insurer from negative consequences, reinforcing why the cantonal law (excluding compensation) is applicable despite federal principles.
36.2001.4 · ti (Art. 20 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Spousal Liability for Mandatory Health Insurance Premiums Despite Separation of Goods Regime
Cited in the reasoning regarding the designation of the social assistance authority for unreclaimable credits.
36.2003.45 · ti (art. 20 LCAMal)
Insured's Cancellation Refusal and Subsequent Double Insurance Resolution
Cited by the IAS in the reasoning (point 6) regarding the cantonal payment of outstanding amounts if there are certificates of default, suggesting it's the basis for one of the parties' financial claims, although the final order itself only concerns taking the case off the roll.