853.100
LCAMALKVGAV
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 11 LCAMal Legge di applicazione della legge federale sull’assicurazione malattie (LCAMal)
LCAMal
Art. 11 LCAMal
1 Il Consiglio di Stato definisce le procedure di vigilanza sull’adempimento dell’obbligo d’assicurazione.
2 Il regolamento specifica le norme di applicazione del controllo dell’obbligo d’assicurazione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (46)
36.2010.86 · ti (Art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Denied Health Premium Reduction Appeal Due to Untimely Submission
Cited regarding the IAS's ability to accept late applications for well-founded special reasons.
36.2010.88 · ti (Art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Insurer: Late Health Insurance Premium Reduction Application Timeliness
The court analyzed whether the delay was justifiable under this procedural rule, concluding that the appellant's reasons were insufficient.
36.2009.170 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 lett. a Reg. LCAMal)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Appeal for 2009 Income Change
This article defining the deadline for ordinarily taxed persons was cited in the reasoning regarding the initial untimeliness of the application.
36.2004.23 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 LCAMal)
Insurance Obligation Commencement Date Dispute
Cited to establish the State Council's role in defining supervision procedures for insurance obligation compliance.
36.2009.141 · ti (art. 11 Reg. LCAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Application Deadline Appeal
The appeal was dismissed because the application was filed past the deadline stipulated by this article, as noted in the reasoning leading to order 1.
36.2009.120 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Apprentice Denied Late Premium Reduction Due to Untimely Health Insurance Application
Although cited in the reasoning to discuss timeliness, the rejection of the appeal (Order 1) implies the application of the rule that rejected the untimely request.
36.2009.128 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Apprentice Parent v. Sickness Insurance Office: Late Premium Reduction Application Denied
Cited as the rule allowing the Social Insurance Institute to accept late applications in special cases, which the court found the appellant did not meet.
36.2009.145 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (Late Application for Premium Reduction)
Cited in the reasoning (point 5) to establish the general deadlines for filing subsidy applications.
36.2009.145 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (Late Application for Premium Reduction)
Cited extensively in the reasoning (point 7) concerning the conditions under which the Insurance Institute may accept late requests, which indirectly supports the final decision to reject the appeal.
36.2009.145 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (Late Application for Premium Reduction)
Cited in the reasoning (point 5 and 7) regarding the possibility for the Institute to accept applications filed outside the established deadlines in special cases.
36.2009.106 · ti (articolo 11 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Person v. Health Insurance Fund: Timeliness and Eligibility for 2009 Premium Reduction
Although cited extensively in the reasoning regarding the timeliness requirement, the final orders (dispositive) do not explicitly cite it as the ground for rejecting the appeal.
36.2009.114 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 lett. a Reg. LCAMal)
Insured's Appeal for Late Premium Reduction Denied Due to Lack of Justified Excuse
Cited in the reasoning leading to the dismissal of the appeal, defining the deadline violated by the appellant.
36.2009.109 · ti (articolo 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Sickness Insurance Premium Reduction Appeal for Untimely Filing
The decision implicitly rejects the appeal based on jurisprudence regarding the justification of late requests, which is governed by this article.
36.2009.97 · ti (art. 11 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Denied Late Premium Reduction Appeal for Failure to Meet Statutory Deadline
Cited to establish that the application was late for an ordinarily taxed insured person (Art. 11 lett. a).
36.2009.97 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 2 Reg. LCAMal)
Insured Denied Late Premium Reduction Appeal for Failure to Meet Statutory Deadline
The court rejected the appeal because the delay in submitting the application was not considered justified under this procedural rule.