851.200
LALPCLLPC
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 13 LaLPC Legge di applicazione della legge federale concernente le prestazioni complementari all’assicurazione federale per la vecchiaia, i superstiti e l’invalidità (LaLPC)
LaLPC
Art. 13 LaLPC
1 Le spese per trattamenti dentari semplici, economici e adeguati sono rimborsate.
2 Per il rimborso è determinante la tariffa dell’assicurazione infortuni, dell’assicurazione militare e dell’assicurazione invalidità (tariffa AINF/AM/AI) per gli onorari delle prestazioni dentarie e la tariffa AINF/AM/AI per i lavori di tecnica dentaria.
3 I preventivi e le fatture devono rispettare le posizioni tariffali della tariffa AINF/AM/AI.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)
33.2023.2 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Appeal Regarding Partial Reimbursement of Dental Expenses
This article establishes that dental expenses are reimbursable only if they correspond to simple, economical, and adequate treatments, which served as the substantive basis for partially upholding the appeal regarding treatments on tooth no. 13.
33.2020.18 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Social Insurance Reimbursement for Dental Care with Psychiatric Condition
Cited as the legal basis regarding the requirement that dental treatments must be simple, economic, and appropriate for reimbursement.
33.2019.17 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Insured Seeks Reimbursement for Dental Implants Over Standard Prosthesis
This provision, concerning simple, economical, and appropriate dental treatments, forms the primary legal basis for rejecting the appeal and confirming the contested decision.
33.2014.31 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Insured vs. Compensation Fund Regarding Dental Crown Reimbursement
The court's decision to reject the appeal confirms that the incurred dental expenses did not meet the criteria of simplicity, economy, and adequacy required by this article for reimbursement.
33.2010.24 · ti (Art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Insured Person v. Cantonal Compensation Fund (Dental Reimbursement Limitation)
This provision sets the condition that dental treatments must be simple, economical, and adequate for reimbursement, which was the core criterion for judging the merits of the appeal.
33.2010.24 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Beneficiary Dental Treatment Cost Dispute
This provision was used to verify that the dental expenses satisfied the criteria of simplicity, economy, and adequacy, which is the basis for reimbursement.
33.2014.31 · ti (Art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Beneficiary Reimbursement for Cerec Crown Denied Due to Lack of Prior Approval and Excessive Cost
Determined the substantive criterion that only simple, economical, and adequate dental treatments are reimbursed.
33.2019.17 · ti (Art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Recipient of Supplementary Benefits v. Compensation Fund (Dental Prosthetics Coverage)
The Tribunal confirmed the decision based on the requirement that dental treatments must be simple, economic, and appropriate.
33.2020.18 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Compensation Fund Reimbursement for Extensive Dental Work and Necessity of Treatment
The court explicitly refers to this article, which sets forth the criteria of simplicity, economy, and appropriateness for the reimbursement of dental treatments, as the basis for its decision.
33.2021.4 · ti (Art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Applicant v. Compensation Fund (Dental Reimbursement Post-Benefit Cessation)
This article specifically addresses the reimbursement of costs for simple, economical, and adequate dental treatments.
33.2023.2 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 LaLPC)
Cantonal Insurance Court Ruling on Supplementary Benefits for Non-Urgent Dental Care
The appeal was partially upheld based on the principle that only expenses for simple, economical, and adequate dental treatments are reimbursed.
80.2013.42 · ti (art. 13 cpv. 1 della Legge cantonale di applicazione (LaLPC; RL 6.4.5.3))
Taxpayer Appeal Regarding Partial Tax Remission Due to Financial Hardship
Cited in the reasoning (4.4) regarding reimbursement of dental expenses, but not in the dispositive orders.