Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
806.100 LASP CH-TI

Art. 52 LASP Legge sull’assistenza sociopsichiatrica (LASP)

LASP
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (59 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 52 LASP

Sono legittimati a ricorrere

a) l’interessato, anche indipendentemente dal proprio rappresentante legale;

b) il suo rappresentante legale;

c) ogni persona prossima.

← Art. 51 LASP Legge sull’assistenza sociopsichiatrica (LASP) Art. 53 LASP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (17)

52.2010.243 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Compulsory Socio-Psychiatric Placement for Substance Dependency and Imminent Danger
This article, concerning the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court, is cited in the basis for the final orders.
52.2010.90 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Appeal Against Rejection of Challenge to Forced Psychopharmaceutical Treatment
Cited in the preamble to the decision, related to the admissibility of the appeal.
52.2008.39 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Patient Appeal Against Involuntary Lithium Pharmacotherapy Upheld
Cited in the consideration section to establish jurisdiction and active standing, relevant to the admissibility/rejection of the appeal.
52.2007.118 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Appeal Regarding Involuntary Psychiatric Admission Order Upheld
Cited in the final orders regarding the admissibility context of the appeal.
52.2006.372 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Appeal Regarding Involuntary Commitment and Mandatory Outpatient Treatment for Psychosis
Cited in the preamble to the final orders, confirming jurisdiction/admissibility which leads to the judgment on the merits.
52.2003.255 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Guardianship Order for Involuntary Commitment and Mandatory Outpatient Neuroleptic Therapy Upheld Despite Discharge from Inpatient Care
Cited in the final orders preamble, relating to the jurisdiction and active legitimacy for appeal.
52.2003.22 · ti (art. 50, 51, 52 LASP)
Appeal Regarding Coercive Psychiatric Admission Pending Capacity Assessment
These articles concerning appeal procedures were listed in the preamble to the operative part regarding the decision to reject the appeal.
52.2002.486 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Appeal of Involuntary Psychiatric Confinement Due to Substance Abuse and Treatment Non-Compliance
Cited as one of the provisions governing the decision, related to the right to appeal.
52.2000.133 · ti (Art. 52 LASP)
Compulsory Confinement Upheld for Patient with Schizoaffective Disorder
Cited in the list of articles under which judgment is pronounced.
52.2002.298 · ti (art. 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 50, 51, 52 LASP)
Cantonal Court Upholds Compulsory Detention for Paranoid Schizophrenia Patient
These are the procedural and substantive articles listed under the authority used to render the decision, implicitly supporting the dismissal of the appeal.
52.2002.486 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Compulsory Psychiatric Placement Upheld for Dependent Individual Post-Treatment Failure
Cited in the grounds for the decision as part of the legal basis for the Tribunal's jurisdiction and the appealability.
52.2003.22 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Coercive Psychiatric Hospitalization and Capacity Assessment Dispute
This provision was cited in the list of relevant articles for the decision, likely related to procedural aspects concerning the Tribunal's action.
52.2006.401 · ti (art. 52 LASP)
Compulsory Psychiatric Placement Following Medication Discontinuation
Cited among the provisions invoked when rendering the decision, related to the overall legal framework for the decision.
52.2007.335 · ti (art. 50, 52 LASP)
Involuntarily Committed Patient's Appeal on Transfer and Discharge Lacked Appealable Decision
These articles define the jurisdiction and means of appeal concerning the decision on socio-psychiatric assistance.
52.2008.39 · ti (art. 50 e 52 LASP)
Patient Challenge to Mandated Lithium Dosage in Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Upheld
These articles were cited in the final orders implicitly via point 1, as they concern the basis for recourse against coactive treatment to the Administrative Tribunal, which determined the admissibility and outcome of the appeal.