Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
730.500 CIAPIVöBCIMP CH-TI

Art. 15 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP)

CIAP
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (24 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 15 CIAP

1 Contro le decisioni del committente è data la possibilità di ricorso a un’istanza cantonale indipendente. Quest’ultima decide in via definitiva.

1bis Per decisioni impugnabili autonomamente mediante ricorso s’intendono

a) il bando di concorso della commessa;

b) la decisione sull’inserimento di un offerente in una lista permanente secondo l’articolo 13 lett. e;

c) la decisione sulla scelta dei partecipanti nella procedura selettiva;

d) l’esclusione dalla procedura;

e) l’attribuzione dell’appalto, la relativa revoca o l’interruzione della procedura d’aggiudicazione.

2 I ricorsi devono essere inoltrati in forma scritta, debitamente motivati, entro 10 giorni dalla notifica delle decisioni.

2bis Le ferie giudiziarie non valgono.

3 In mancanza di disposizioni d’esecuzione cantonali, il Tribunale federale è competente per i ricorsi relativi all’applicazione del presente Concordato.

← Art. 14 CIAP Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) Art. 16 CIAP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (317)

52.2025.119 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
Cited to establish the Administrative Tribunal's competence regarding the public tender law.
52.2025.119 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. a CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
Cited to establish the appellant's standing to challenge the tender notice.
52.2025.119 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Child Transportation Tender Annulled for Sub-Criteria Weighting Omission
Cited to confirm the timeliness of the appeal.
52.2024.278 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. d CIAP)
Administrative Court Upholds Exclusion for Unfair Competitive Advantage in Railway Renovation Tender
Cited in the reasoning to establish the appellant's standing, although the final decision rejects the appeal on other grounds.
52.2024.278 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Administrative Court Upholds Exclusion for Unfair Competitive Advantage in Railway Renovation Tender
Cited in the reasoning regarding the timeliness of the appeal, which was deemed admissible in part.
52.2024.266 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Appeal Regarding Transport Service Contract Award Dismissed Due to Administrative Correction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's jurisdiction, but not explicitly in the final orders.
52.2024.266 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. d CIAP)
Appeal Regarding Transport Service Contract Award Dismissed Due to Administrative Correction
Cited in the reasoning to establish the appellant's standing to appeal against the decision.
52.2024.266 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Appeal Regarding Transport Service Contract Award Dismissed Due to Administrative Correction
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the appeal was timely, but not explicitly in the final orders.
52.2024.204 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. a CIAP)
Challenge to Public Tender Criteria: Subjective Evaluation Weight and Language Requirements Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 1.1) to establish the appellant's standing to challenge the tender notice, although not explicitly repeated in the final orders, it is part of the procedural ruling establishing admissibility.
52.2024.161 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Award Based on Unduly Specific Technical Specifications
Established the court's competence to hear the appeal.
52.2024.161 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. e CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Award Based on Unduly Specific Technical Specifications
Established the appellant's standing (legitimation) to contest the award decision.
52.2024.161 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 2 CIAP)
Contractor Challenge to Award Based on Unduly Specific Technical Specifications
Established that the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit.
52.2024.135 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. d CIAP)
Consortium Appeal Against Tender Annulment for Insufficient Reference Project and Subsequent Tender Restart
Cited in the reasoning (though not strictly in the final orders) to establish the appellant's standing to challenge their exclusion; however, since the appeal was rejected on the merits, this is less central than the procedural rules governing the decision itself.
52.2024.120 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1 CIAP)
Administrative Court Annuls Construction Contract Award Based on Invalid Reference Project Score
Cited in section 1.1 as the basis for the Tribunal's competence.
52.2024.120 · ti (art. 15 cpv. 1bis lett. e CIAP)
Administrative Court Annuls Construction Contract Award Based on Invalid Reference Project Score
Cited in section 1.1 to establish the standing (legitimacy) of the appealing consortium members to contest the contract award.