701.100
LSTROGLAT
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 66 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)
LST
Art. 66 LST
1 È permessa la conservazione e la manutenzione di costruzioni esistenti in contrasto col nuovo diritto.
2 Possono essere autorizzate trasformazioni a condizione che
a) il contrasto col nuovo diritto non pregiudichi in modo apprezzabile l’interesse pubblico e quello dei vicini e
b) per costruzioni non conformi alla zona (art. 22 cpv. 2 lett. a LPT), le trasformazioni siano giustificate da esigenze tecniche o funzionali e siano rispettate le altre disposizioni del piano regolatore.
3 Il piano regolatore può stabilire una regolamentazione più restrittiva.
4 In caso di grave contrasto con la destinazione di zona può essere ordinata la cessazione dell’uso.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)
52.2022.204 · ti (Art. 66 cpv. 1 LST)
Cantonal Court Annuls Parking Space Permit Modifications Due to Lack of Cantonal Review
Allows for the maintenance and preservation of existing constructions that are in conflict with new law.
52.2023.50 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. b LST)
State Council Decision Annulment of Building Permit for Enogastronomic Club in Industrial Zone
This provision was mentioned in the reasoning regarding permitted transformations in case of deviation from zoning but was not the decisive factor for the final order.
52.2019.455 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owner Appeal Denied: Upward Extension Invalid Due to Underlying Boundary Violations
This article was implicitly used as the main ground for rejecting the appeal, as the decision confirmed that the transformation was unauthorized under this provision concerning existing constructions conflicting with new law.
52.2019.409 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 1 e 2 della legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST))
Appeal Regarding Denial of Permit for Covering External Staircase on Materially Illegal Structure
Cited in the reasoning regarding the preservation and transformation conditions for existing constructions within building zones that conflict with new law.
52.2018.412 · ti (Art. 66 LST)
Building Permit Annulment Due to Expansion of Existing Zoning Violation
The court's decision to uphold the appeal is based on the analysis of whether the construction constituted maintenance or a transformation exceeding the scope permitted for existing buildings in conflict with new law (Art. 66 LST).
52.2017.659 · ti (art. 66 LST)
Building Permit Appeal: Barn Conversion Deemed New Construction Violating Setback Requirements
Cited in the context of the constitutional guarantee of property rights (situations acquired), but ultimately found insufficient to protect the project given its substantial transformation.
52.2017.273 · ti (Art. 66 LST)
Demolition Without Permit and Subsequent Denial of Reconstruction
The article defining the limits for transforming existing buildings under the acquired situation guarantee was central to denying the building permit.
52.2016.449 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Building Permit Revocation for Non-Conforming Vertical Extension
This provision was cited in the reasoning leading to the dismissal of the appeal, as the extension consolidated existing conflicts with post-entry-into-force law.
52.2016.62 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owner vs. Municipality: Demolition and Enlargement of Balconies Beyond Permitted Maintenance
This provision was cited by the State Council in the reasoning, which the court found necessary to examine in relation to the existing structures in conflict with the new law, although the court ultimately denied the permit based on the demolition/reconstruction aspect.
52.2013.199 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 Lst)
Cantonal Executive Decision on Building Permit Revocation Remanded for Factual Determination on Woodshed Alteration.
This provision was cited in the reasoning for the subsequent review required by the court regarding the transformation of the existing structure.
40.2015.1 · ti (art. 66 Lst.)
Expropriation Tribunal Annuls Valuation Update Lacking Motivation
Although costs were imposed on the losing authority, the explicit citation in the final orders is the article governing appeal fees in appeals before this Tribunal (implied, as the decision cites Lst and LPAmm generally and then imposes costs).
52.2018.171 · ti (art. 66 LST)
Neighbor Challenge to Building Permit Over GFA Calculation and Green Space Requirements
Cited in the reasoning section regarding expansion of existing buildings, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
52.2018.171 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 LST)
Neighbor Challenge to Building Permit Over GFA Calculation and Green Space Requirements
Cited in the reasoning section regarding necessity for expansion, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
52.2022.204 · ti (Art. 66 LST)
Neighboring Landowner v. Property Owner and Municipality Regarding Unauthorized Garage Modifications and Parking Increase
This provision on the guarantee of acquired situations (Besitzstandsgarantie) was implicitly negated in the reasoning for annulling the permit for the two new parking spaces, as the construction was not considered to fall under this guarantee but rather due to a lack of necessary pre-requisites (sufficient urbanization/access).