Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
701.100 LSTROGLAT CH-TI

Art. 64 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)

LST
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (133 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 64 LST

1 Contro la zona di pianificazione e la sua proroga è dato ricorso al Tribunale cantonale amministrativo entro quindici giorni dalla scadenza del termine di pubblicazione; il ricorso non ha effetto sospensivo.

2 Sono legittimati a ricorrere

a) ogni persona o ente che dimostri un interesse degno di protezione,

b) il Comune, contro la zona di pianificazione stabilita dal Consiglio di Stato.

3 Contro le decisioni di sospensione o di blocco edilizio è dato ricorso ai sensi della legge edilizia cantonale del 13 marzo 1991 (LE).

← Art. 63 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST) Art. 65 LST →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (26)

90.2021.40 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Suspension in Planning Zone
Cited in the reasoning as establishing the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the appeal.
90.2021.40 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Suspension in Planning Zone
Cited in the reasoning as establishing the active standing (legittimazione attiva) of the appellants.
90.2022.7 · ti (Art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owners and Tenants v. Municipality on Three-Year Planning Zone Validity
Cited to establish the Administrative Court's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal.
90.2022.7 · ti (Art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owners and Tenants v. Municipality on Three-Year Planning Zone Validity
Cited to establish the active standing (legitimation) of RI 1 and RI 2 as property owners affected by the planning zone.
90.2020.27 · ti (Art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Five-Year Planning Zone Establishment
Used to establish the jurisdiction of the Administrative Cantonal Tribunal for the appeal.
90.2020.27 · ti (Art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Five-Year Planning Zone Establishment
Used to establish the active standing of the appellant as an affected property owner.
90.2020.29 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Landowner Challenge to Municipal Planning Zone Dismissed
This provision establishes the court's jurisdiction and confirms the admissibility of the appeal based on timeliness.
90.2020.29 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Landowner Challenge to Municipal Planning Zone Dismissed
This provision confirms the active standing (legitimation) of the appellant as the owner affected by the measure.
90.2019.40 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Municipality Planning Zone for Kindergarten Upheld
Cited in section 1.1 to confirm the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court (though not explicitly repeated in the final orders, it is part of the procedural context established for admissibility checks that precede the final judgment).
90.2019.40 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Municipality Planning Zone for Kindergarten Upheld
Cited in section 1.1 to confirm the active standing of the appellant (though not explicitly repeated in the final orders, it is part of the procedural context established for admissibility checks that precede the final judgment).
90.2018.25 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality on Planning Zone Validity
Cited as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction regarding the appeal.
90.2018.25 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality on Planning Zone Validity
Cited to confirm the active standing (legitimation) of the appellant as an affected property owner.
90.2018.26 · ti (Art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Planning Zone Prematurity
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction and the admissibility of the appeal, but not in the dispositive orders.
90.2018.26 · ti (Art. 64 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Planning Zone Prematurity
Cited in the reasoning to establish the active standing of the appellants, but not in the dispositive orders.
90.2018.11 · ti (art. 64 cpv. 1 LST)
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning for Industrial Area Overturned
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the court's competence and the timeliness of the appeal for some appellants.