701.100
LSTROGLAT
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 62 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)
LST
Art. 62 LST
1 Il Municipio o il Dipartimento sospendono per due anni al massimo le proprie decisioni se, in assenza di una zona di pianificazione, la domanda di costruzione appare in contrasto con uno studio pianificatorio in atto.
2 Il Municipio o il Dipartimento decidono immediatamente sull’oggetto sospeso oppure danno avvio alla procedura d’espropriazione, se alla scadenza dei due anni il piano regolatore o il piano particolareggiato non sono stati pubblicati, o il piano d’utilizzazione cantonale non è stato adottato.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (18)
90.2022.7 · ti (Art. 62 LST)
Property Owners and Tenants v. Municipality on Three-Year Planning Zone Validity
Cited to describe the decision to suspend planning (decisione sospensiva) as an alternative measure, and later to justify the choice of a planning zone over it.
52.2019.289 · ti (art. 62 e 63 LST)
Property Owner Appeals Denial of Permits for Historic Building Courtyard Roofs
These provisions were cited to argue that the initial construction in 2014 should have been suspended due to the building freeze related to the PRP adoption.
52.2019.550 · ti (art. 62 LST)
Appeal Against Executive Order Annulment of Building Permit Refusal and Instruction for Safeguard Measure Imposition
This provision was cited as the legal basis for the suspension of the building permit application, which the lower court's judgment ordered.
52.2021.180 · ti (Art. 62 LST)
Administrative Court Upholds Suspension of Building Permits Due to Substantial Project Alterations and Planning Conflicts
The court confirmed the government's decision to uphold the suspension of the construction applications based on this article concerning conflict with ongoing planning.
90.2018.26 · ti (Art. 62 LST)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Planning Zone Prematurity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the suspensive decision as a subsidiary measure, but not explicitly in the dispositive.
90.2018.11 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 2 LST)
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning for Industrial Area Overturned
Cited to specify the effects of the planning zone concerning actions that impede future planning.
90.2018.11 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 3 LST)
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning for Industrial Area Overturned
Cited to specify that building permits contrary to the objectives of the plan in formation shall be decided negatively.
90.2017.40 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 2 LST)
Property Owner Appeal Against Municipal Planning Zone Dismissed
Cited regarding the cantonal law reiterating the effects of the planning zone.
90.2017.40 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 3 LST)
Property Owner Appeal Against Municipal Planning Zone Dismissed
Cited regarding the rejection of building permits contrary to the objectives of the plan under formation.
90.2016.8 · ti (art. 62 LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Planning Zone Validity
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 3.1.1 and 6.3) to mention the suspension decision as an alternative safeguard measure.
90.2016.8 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Planning Zone Validity
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 3.1.1) regarding the conditions for suspension decisions.
90.2016.8 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 2 LST)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Planning Zone Validity
Cited in the reasoning (considerand 3.1.1) regarding the consequences of not publishing the plan after the suspension period.
90.2012.34 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 2 Lst)
Property Owner Appeals Municipal Planning Zone Designation
This provision specifies the effect of the planning zone, prohibiting actions that complicate planning.
52.2013.193 · ti (art. 65 LALPT (ora: art. 62 Lst))
Villa Demolition Permit Appeal Over Jurisdiction
The court acknowledged that the municipal decision was taken after the two-year suspension period based on this article had expired, which formed part of the context for annulling the subsequent ban.
11.2010.113 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 1 Lst)
Necessary Access for Development Under Existing Road Framework
Cited in the reasoning (section 7).