Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
701.100 LSTROGLAT CH-TI

Art. 38 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)

LST
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (133 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 38 LST

Se l’urbanizzazione della zona edificabile non è realizzata nei termini previsti dal programma d’urbanizzazione, i proprietari fondiari possono (art. 19 cpv. 3 LPT)

a) provvedere da sé all’urbanizzazione dei fondi secondo i piani approvati, stabilendo con il Comune per contratto di diritto pubblico segnatamente le modalità d’esecuzione dei lavori, il diritto di proprietà sulle opere, le condizioni per l’allacciamento dei vicini, il riscatto delle opere e il trasferimento di diritti e obblighi all’ente pubblico,

b) anticipare i costi dell’urbanizzazione, stabilendo con il Comune mediante contratto di diritto pubblico segnatamente l’importo da anticipare, il rimborso del capitale anticipato e l’interesse dovuto.

← Art. 37 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST) Art. 39 LST →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (546)

40.2009.3 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 Lst.)
Property Owners v. Cantonal Estimation Office (Property Valuation Reassessment)
Cited along with Art. 18 para. 1 LPamm to confirm the Tribunal's full power of cognizance.
40.2009.3 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 2 Lst.)
Property Owners v. Cantonal Estimation Office (Property Valuation Reassessment)
Cited to establish that the procedure before the Expropriation Tribunal is governed by the official maxim, requiring the authority to ascertain the facts completely.
40.2009.3 · ti (art. 38, cpv 3 Lst.)
Property Owners v. Cantonal Estimation Office (Property Valuation Reassessment)
Cited to confirm that the court is not bound by the appellant's requests and can reform the decision to their detriment.
40.2005.220 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 Lst.)
Expropriation Court Partial Upholding of Property Valuation Appeal
Cited to confirm the court's full cognitive power (giudicare con pieno potere cognitivo) when assessing the appeal.
40.2005.220 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 3 Lst.)
Expropriation Court Partial Upholding of Property Valuation Appeal
Cited to confirm the court is not bound by the appellant's requests, allowing reform of the decision even to the appellant's detriment, and used in context of the review of parcel 4649.
40.2005.220 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 4 Lst.)
Expropriation Court Partial Upholding of Property Valuation Appeal
Applied to determine the apportionment of court costs (tassa di giustizia) based on the degree of success.
40.2009.1 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 4 Lst.)
Property Valuation Challenge Based on Zoning Revision
This article was cited in the dispositive to order the costs to be borne by the appellant.
40.2009.2 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 4 Lst.)
Property Valuation Appeal Over Accessory Building Demolition and Land Classification
This provision was cited to assign the court fee and expenses to the losing party (the appellant).
40.2008.4 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 Lst.)
Property Owner v. State: Cadastral Valuation Dispute (Parcel 553)
Cited in conjunction with Art. 18 cpv. 1 LPamm. to establish the Tribunal's full power of review when partially granting the appeal.
40.2008.4 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 3 Lst.)
Property Owner v. State: Cadastral Valuation Dispute (Parcel 553)
The court implicitly used this article, which limits the Tribunal's ability to reform a decision to the detriment of the appellant, to reject certain claims of the appellant (Point 8.3) while partially granting the appeal (Point 1).
40.2008.5 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 Lst.)
Property Valuation Appeal: Accessory Building Corrections and Integrated Structure Assessment
Cited in point 8, supporting the court's full cognitive power in judging the case, which leads to the partial acceptance of the appeal in order 1.
40.2008.5 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 3 Lst.)
Property Valuation Appeal: Accessory Building Corrections and Integrated Structure Assessment
Cited in point 8, where the court confirms it is not bound by the appellant's claims when partially accepting the appeal in order 1.
40.2008.3 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 Lst.)
Property Valuation Appeal Regarding Omission of Income Value Component
Cited in the reasoning (point 6) to establish the principle of official investigation (accertamento d’ufficio) that governs the procedure before the Expropriation Tribunal.
40.2008.3 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 Lst.)
Property Valuation Appeal Regarding Omission of Income Value Component
Cited in the reasoning (point 8) to confirm the Tribunal's full power of cognition, which applies in conjunction with LPamm provisions regarding the referral.
40.2008.3 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 3 Lst.)
Property Valuation Appeal Regarding Omission of Income Value Component
Cited in the reasoning (point 6 and 8) regarding the power of the second instance authority to reform the decision, supporting the Tribunal's jurisdiction in the matter.