Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
701.100 LSTROGLAT CH-TI

Art. 30 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)

LST
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (133 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 30 LST

1 Contro le decisioni del Consiglio di Stato è dato ricorso al Tribunale cantonale amministrativo entro trenta giorni dalla notificazione.

2 Sono legittimati a ricorrere

a) il Comune,

b) i già ricorrenti, per le medesime domande presentate davanti al Consiglio di Stato, [13]

c) ogni altra persona o ente che dimostri un interesse degno di protezione a dipendenza delle modifiche decise dal Consiglio di Stato.

3 Per i motivi di ricorso e la procedura si applica la legge sulla procedura amministrativa del 24 settembre 2013. [14]

[13] Lett. modificata dalla L 21.6.2021; in vigore dal 1.1.2022 - BU 2021, 368.

[14] Cpv. modificato dalla L 24.9.2013; in vigore dal 1.3.2014 - BU 2013, 476.

← Art. 29 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST) Art. 31 LST →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (87)

90.2020.4 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 LST)
Cantonal Council Zoning Revision Challenged Over Cross-Municipal Commercial Area Limit
Cited to confirm the jurisdiction of the Administrative Tribunal and the continued interest of the appellants in the outcome of their appeals.
90.2020.4 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 lett. a e c LST)
Cantonal Council Zoning Revision Challenged Over Cross-Municipal Commercial Area Limit
Cited to confirm the active standing (legittimazione attiva) of the appellants to challenge the resolution of December 18, 2019.
90.2022.42 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 LST)
Administrative Court Overturns Forest Clearing Permit Due to Procedural and Substantive Flaws
Cited to establish the Administrative Court's jurisdiction in general.
90.2022.42 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 lett. b LST)
Administrative Court Overturns Forest Clearing Permit Due to Procedural and Substantive Flaws
Cited to establish the appellant's active standing (legitimation active) to contest the decision.
90.2023.2 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 della legge sullo sviluppo territoriale del 21 giugno 2011; LST; RL 701.100)
Challenge to Zoning Plan Amendment Refusing Forest Land Reassignment to Residential Zone
Used to establish the jurisdiction of the Administrative Cantonal Court for the appeal.
90.2023.2 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 lett. c LST)
Challenge to Zoning Plan Amendment Refusing Forest Land Reassignment to Residential Zone
Used to establish the active standing (legitimation active) of the appellant.
90.2023.27 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 LST)
Appeal Against Zoning Modification Procedure in Castagnola
Cited as part of the provision establishing the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
90.2023.5 · ti (Art. 30 cpv. 3 LST)
Property Owner v. State Zoning Denial Regarding Church View Protection
Cited in relation to the court's limited review power over the administrative decision, although the main ground for rejection is substantive.
90.2024.1 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 LST)
Property Owner Appeal of Land Use Plan Adjustment Barred by Procedural Omission
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the appellant lacked active legitimacy under this provision.
90.2020.66 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 della legge sullo sviluppo territoriale del 21 giugno 2011; LST; RL 701.100)
Appeal Rejected Regarding Zoning Plan Amendments and Demolition Regulation Compliance
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 1.1) regarding the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court.
90.2020.66 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 lett. b e c LST)
Appeal Rejected Regarding Zoning Plan Amendments and Demolition Regulation Compliance
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 1.1) regarding the active standing of the appellants.
90.2020.39 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 lett. a LST)
Municipality Appeal of Inter-Municipal Development Plan Approval Deemed Inadmissible
The court found the appeal inadmissible based on the provisions governing who is entitled to appeal against the government's approval of a regulatory plan.
90.2021.53 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 LST)
Appellant Lacks Standing to Challenge Zoning Amendment Due to Untimely Appeal and Procedural Misjoinder of Bus Stop Complaint
The ruling relies on the analysis of this article to determine the appellant's lack of standing to appeal the planning resolution.
90.2020.58 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 1 LST)
Taxpayers v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendment Validity)
Cited to establish the competence of the Administrative Court and the admissibility of the appeal, which are prerequisites for the examination of the merits, although not the core ground for annulment.
90.2020.58 · ti (art. 30 cpv. 2 lett. b LST)
Taxpayers v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendment Validity)
Cited to establish the active legitimacy of the appellants, a procedural requirement for admissibility.