701.100
LSTROGLAT
CH-TI
Art. 29 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)
LST
Art. 29 LST
1 Il Consiglio di Stato esamina gli atti, decide i ricorsi e approva in tutto o in parte il piano regolatore; oppure nega l’approvazione.
2 Quando si impone una modifica che coinvolge il diritto comunale, esso rinvia gli atti al Comune, affinché vi provveda ripetendo la procedura ordinaria; il Consiglio di Stato indica quando si può prescindere dall’esame preliminare o applicare la procedura semplificata .
3 La decisione del Consiglio di Stato è intimata al Comune, ai ricorrenti e ai proprietari dei fondi la cui situazione è stata modificata dalla risoluzione ed è pubblicata nella sua parte dispositiva.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)
90.2020.4 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LST)
Cantonal Council Zoning Revision Challenged Over Cross-Municipal Commercial Area Limit
Cited in the context explaining when the Council of State can amend a municipal plan directly instead of returning it for a new decision.
90.2014.39 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LST)
Property Owners v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendments)
Cited in the reasoning explaining why the State Council should have referred the decision back to the municipality instead of modifying it directly.
90.2011.43 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 1 Lst)
Property Owners V. State Council Zoning Revision Approval
Cited in the reasoning regarding the Cantonal Council's full scope of review.
90.2011.41 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 1 Lst)
Gambarogno Public Green Space Zoning Annulment
Cited to identify the Council of State's role under current Cantonal Law.
90.2014.39 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LST)
Cantonal Court Voids State Council's Revision of Municipal Development Plan Article 49 Overstep
Cited as the procedural ground mandating the lower authority (municipality) to issue a new decision instead of the State Council making executive modifications.
90.2015.10 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 1 LST)
Property Owner v. Cantonal Government Regarding Zoning Plan Revision and Mandatory Neighborhood Plan Coordination
Cited in the reasoning regarding the State Council's role in plan approval.
90.2017.35 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LST)
Owner Challenge to Cantonal Zoning Amendment Over Cultural Heritage Substation and Development Incentives
Cited in the reasoning regarding the obligation to send the case back to the lower authority, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3).
90.2020.4 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LST)
Cantonal Court Annuls Magadino Plain Planning Revisions Over Traffic Generator and Joint Planning Failures
Cited in the reasoning concerning the duty to refer back to the lower authority in case of non-approval of a municipal plan.