701.100
LSTROGLAT
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 117 LST Legge sullo sviluppo territoriale (LST)
LST
Art. 117 LST
[68] 1 Le procedure in corso prima dell’entrata in vigore di questa legge sono concluse secondo il diritto anteriore.
2 Le procedure semplificate ai sensi dell’art. 35 approvate dal Dipartimento al momento dell’entrata in vigore della modifica legislativa del 21 giugno 2021, sono concluse in applicazione del diritto anteriore.
[68] Art. modificato dalla L 21.6.2021; in vigore dal 1.1.2022 - BU 2021, 368; precedente modifica: BU 2015, 40.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)
90.2022.42 · ti (art. 117 cpv. 2 LST)
Administrative Court Overturns Forest Clearing Permit Due to Procedural and Substantive Flaws
Cited to determine that the applicable law for assessing the merits of the variation is the previous law (vLST) because the decision was approved before the new law came into force.
90.2022.9 · ti (art. 117 cpv. 2 LST)
Zoning Variance for Helicopter Landing Area Overruled Due to Improper Application of Transitional Law
The court's decision to annul the resolution rested on the correct interpretation of this transitional provision, which mandated the application of the prior law.
90.2021.11 · ti (art. 117 LST)
Cantonal Landscape Plan Challenge Regarding Rural Building Protection and Land Separation
Determined that the LALPT remains applicable to the merits of the case because the procedure began before the LST entered into force.
90.2021.19 · ti (art. 117 LST)
Cantonal Landscape Plan Challenge Upheld in Part for Magadino Region
Cited as the rule determining the applicable law (LALPT) because the procedure started before the LST entered into force.
90.2014.32 · ti (art. 117 Lst)
Property Owner Challenges Municipal Development Plan Variants and Setback Line Order
Indicates which law (LALPT) applies to the merits of the case because the procedure was initiated under that law.
90.2014.39 · ti (art. 117 LST)
Cantonal Court Voids State Council's Revision of Municipal Development Plan Article 49 Overstep
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the previous cantonal law (LALPT) must be applied to examine the merits of the case.
90.2015.10 · ti (art. 117 LST)
Property Owner v. Cantonal Government Regarding Zoning Plan Revision and Mandatory Neighborhood Plan Coordination
Used to determine the applicable law (LALPT) for this case.
90.2017.13 · ti (art. 117 LST)
Cantonal Court Annuls Zoning Denial Due to Procedural Error, Upholds Rejection of Municipal Minergie Standard Mandate
Cited to determine which law (LALPT) applies to the merits of the revised plan, as the procedure began under the old law.
90.2017.15 · ti (art. 117 LST)
Cantonal Planning Revision Classification Dispute
Cited in reasoning (consid. 1.3) stating that the previous law (LALPT) must be applied, forming the legal framework for the decision, which leads to the dismissal in order 1.
90.2020.69 · ti (art. 117 LST)
ARE v. Cantonal Land Use Plan: Val Verzasca Landscape Protection Boundaries
Used to determine the applicability of the previous law (LALPT) because the procedure began before the LST entered into force.
90.2022.42 · ti (art. 117 cpv. 2 LST)
Cantonal Court Annuls Minor Zoning Modification Due to Improper Procedure and Substantive Flaws
Cited as the basis for applying the law in force at the time the challenged decision was made, rather than the newly effective law.
90.2022.9 · ti (art. 117 cpv. 2 LST)
Cantonal Tribunal Voids Zoning Permit for Helicopter Pad Due to Invalid Simplified Procedure
The main ground for annulling the previous decision was the incorrect application of this transitional provision regarding the applicable law (old vs. new). This provision is cited in the context of accepting the appeals.