Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione

Art. 246 LT

1 Al contribuente caduto nel bisogno, per il quale il pagamento dell’imposta, dell’interesse o della multa per contravvenzione tornerebbe oltremodo gravoso, gli importi dovuti possono essere interamente o parzialmente condonati.

2 La domanda di condono, motivata per scritto e corredata dei mezzi di prova necessari, va presentata all’autorità competente, che decide sentito l’avviso del Municipio del Comune di domicilio o sede del contribuente. L’autorità fiscale può rinunciare al preavviso del Municipio quando il condono ha per oggetto imposte, interessi o multe di esclusiva competenza cantonale e, per le imposte ordinarie, nei casi di poco conto.

3 Per un medesimo periodo fiscale può essere presentata una sola domanda di condono. Contro la decisione di condono è data facoltà di reclamo all’autorità di condono e contro la decisione su reclamo è data facoltà di ricorso alla Camera di diritto tributario entro i termini stabiliti dagli articoli 206 e 227. [371]

4 La domanda di condono o di facilitazioni di pagamento non sospende l’obbligo del pagamento, salvo decisione contraria dell’autorità competente.

[371] Cpv. modificato dalla L 2.12.2008; in vigore dal 27.1.2009 - BU 2009, 41.

← Art. 245 LT Legge tributaria (LT) Art. 247 LT →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (54)

80.2025.97 · ti (Art. 246 LT)
Taxpayer Denied Inheritance Tax Remission After Enforcement Notice
Cited as one of the cumulative requirements (situation of need) for tax remission, although the appeal was rejected on procedural grounds and lack of proof.
80.2021.243 · ti (Art. 246 LT)
Tax Amnesty Denial Upheld Despite Hardship Due to Lack of Prior Reserves
Cited as the general basis for granting tax amnesty when payment would be excessively burdensome, although ultimately denied under Art. 167a LIFD.
80.2022.68 · ti (art. 246 LT)
Tax Amnesty Denial Due to Prioritization of Private Debt over Tax Arrears
Cited as the general legal basis for granting tax remission based on need, which frames the entire decision on the merits (Items 2.1 and 3.1.1).
80.2021.1 · ti (Art. 246 LT)
Tax Amnesty Denial Upheld Due to Sufficient Means
This provision governs the substantive grounds for tax remission, which the court applied when ultimately dismissing the appeal against the refusal of remission.
80.2021.64 · ti (art. 246 cpv. 1 LT)
Taxpayer Appeal of Ex Officio Assessment Based on Joint Taxation Domicile and Procedural Flaws
Cited in the reasoning to inform the appellant about the possibility of applying for tax forgiveness (though not explicitly used in the operative part, the instruction is to check the dispositive, and it's cited alongside LIFD in the preamble to the operative part concerning costs).
80.2020.28 · ti (art. 246 LT)
Taxpayer Granted Full Tax Relief Due to Excessive Financial Burden from Disability Expenses
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the power to grant tax remission to a taxpayer in need.
14.2020.28 · ti (art. 246 cpv. 4 LT)
Municipality v. Debtor: Late Appeal Regarding Unpaid Municipal Taxes
Cited in the reasoning but not explicitly in the dispositive.
80.2019.403 · ti (Art. 246 LT)
Tax Forgiveness Appeal Denied Due to Prior Income Sufficiency
This provision governs the substantive grounds for granting tax remission, which was the subject of the appeal that was ultimately dismissed.
14.2018.189 · ti (art. 246 cpv. 4 LT)
Canton Tax Arrears Enforcement Appeal: Late Installment Request and Competence to Grant Deferral
Cited in the reasoning stating that a request for payment facilitation does not automatically suspend the enforceability of tax decisions.
80.2018.217 · ti (art. 246 cpv. 1 LT)
Taxpayers Appeal Denied for Untimely Filing Despite Foreign Travel
Cited to inform the parties about the correct procedure (remission application) for economic hardship, although not applied to the merits of the appeal.
80.2016.82 · ti (art. 246 LT)
Taxpayer Appeal Against Denial of Tax Amnesty for Cantonal and Communal Taxes
This provision defines the substantive ground for granting tax remission (condono) based on need and undue hardship, which underpins the rejection of the appeal.
80.2016.3 · ti (art. 246 cpv. 3 LT)
Tax Amnesty Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing and Ineligibility Due to Pre-existing Debt
Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Chamber based on the possibility to appeal decisions from the tax collection office.
80.2016.255 · ti (Art. 246 LT)
Tax Forgiveness Denial Upheld Due to Imprudent Financial Decisions
This article, alongside Art. 167 LIFD, establishes the substantive requirements (need and excessive burden) for tax remission, which the court ultimately found not met.
80.2015.148 · ti (art. 246 LT)
Taxpayer Denied Tax Amnesty Despite Financial Distress Due to Mismanagement of Retroactive Payments
The appeal was rejected based on the failure to meet the conditions for tax remission outlined in this article (and Art. 167 LIFD).
80.2013.195 · ti (Art. 246 LT)
Taxpayer Appeal of Abatement Denial Based on Self-Inflicted Hardship
The appeal was dismissed as the court upheld the decision rejecting the tax amnesty request based on the relevant statute.