400.100 LSCSchG

CH-TI

Art. 95 LSc Legge della scuola (LSc) - 1° febbraio 1990

LSc

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (109 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 95 LSc · 1° febbraio 1990

[168] 1 Contro le decisioni del Consiglio di Stato è dato ricorso al Tribunale cantonale amministrativo.

2 Il ricorso non ha effetto sospensivo.

[168] Art. modificato dalla L 2.12.2008; in vigore dal 27.1.2009 - BU 2009, 26.

← Art. 94 LSc Legge della scuola (LSc) - 1° febbraio 1990 Art. 95a LSc →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)

52.2015.158 · ti (art. 95 cpv. 1 LSc)

Parent Appeal on School Admission Age Cutoff

This provision establishes the competence of the Cantonal Administrative Tribunal to review the matter.

52.2009.233 · ti (art. 95 cpv. 1 della legge della scuola del 1° febbraio 1990 (LSc; RL 5.1.1.1))

Denial of Extended Speech Therapy Coverage Upheld

Cited historically to establish the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court at the time the appeal was filed.

52.2012.12 · ti (Art. 95 cpv. 1 della legge della scuola del 1° febbraio 1990 (LSc; RL 5.1.1.1))

Teacher Qualification Dispute for Mathematics and Physics Hours

This provision establishes the competence of the Administrative Cantonal Tribunal, although it does not form the main ground for the final order of dismissal.

52.2010.293 · ti (art. 95 cpv. 1 della legge della scuola del 1° febbraio 1990 (LSc; RL 5.1.1.1))

Study Loan Repayment Enforcement Upheld Against Unproven Conversion Claim

Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction, which is a procedural prerequisite for issuing the final orders.

52.2004.309 · ti (art. 93 e 95 LSc)

Candidate Qualification Dispute in Cantonal School Hiring

Cited in the preamble to the decision to establish the hierarchy of appeals regarding decisions of the DECS and the Council of State.

52.2002.350 · ti (art. 95 Lsc)

Teacher's Request for Part-Time Work Denied Due to Objective Administrative Justification

Cited in the reasoning section to establish the finality of the decision, although not explicitly in the dispositive, it is listed in the cited articles before the operative part.

52.2002.350 · ti (Art. 95 Lsc)

Teacher's Reduced Hours Request Denied Despite Indirect Discrimination Claim

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the final nature of the decision being challenged.

52.2020.399 · ti (art. 95 cpv. 1 LSc)

Municipality v. Cantonal Department of Education (School Funding Allocation)

Cited in section 1.1 to establish the right of appeal to the Administrative Tribunal against the decisions of the State Council.