280.200
LPR
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 15 LPR Legge sulla procedura di ricorso in materia di esecuzione e fallimento (LPR)
LPR
Art. 15 LPR
La rappresentanza processuale è riconosciuta
a) a chi detiene una rappresentanza legale;
b) agli avvocati ammessi al libero esercizio della professione nel Cantone e ai loro praticanti;
c) ai fiduciari con l’autorizzazione cantonale.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)
15.2015.86 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Creditor's Appeal on Seizure of Usufructuary Right
Cited regarding the capacity of the representative in the appeal procedure.
15.2012.113 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Supervisory Dismissal of Enforcement Appeal Due to Lack of Authorization and Merit
This article concerning legal representation was cited in the final orders' preamble, although the primary reason for inadmissibility relies on the defect described under this rule.
15.2012.51 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Unrepresented Appellant's Overpayment Claim Deemed Inadmissible Due to Procedural Flaws and Prior Application
The appeal was declared inadmissible based on this provision regarding non-compliance with representation requirements.
15.2008.24 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Debtor's Appeal of Bankruptcy Threat Based on Pending Federal Supreme Court Review of Counterclaim
Cited as a relevant article concerning procedural representation, relevant to the preliminary objection regarding representation.
15.2001.00259 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Tax Credit Attachment Dispute Transferred to Civil Court
Cited in the reasons leading to the conclusion that one of the appeals was inadmissible due to lack of procedural standing based on this article.
15.2001.241 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Appeal Inadmissibility Based on Unauthorized Representation and Equitable Reinstatement of Summons Deadline
Cited in the introductory section before the operative part, as the main ground for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to lack of proper representation.
15.2001.00052 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Consolidated Appeals on Enforcement Order Against Non-Domiciled Attorney
Cited in the reasoning section and listed in the provisions called upon, supporting the finding that the second appeal was inadmissible due to lack of procedural representation.
15.2001.30 · ti (Art. 15 LPR)
Appeal Against Execution Proceeding Based on Verbal Objection to Enforcement Order
Cited in the preamble of the decision, this article is relevant to representation in administrative appeal proceedings.
15.2001.218 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Debtor's Appeal Against Seizure Following Failure to Timely Object to Debt Collection Notice
Cited in the final ruling section (under 'Richiamati') as a procedural basis.
15.2001.241 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Unauthorized Representation and Deadline Reinstatement in Debt Collection Proceedings
The appeal was declared inadmissible based on the lack of proper procedural representation, as discussed in relation to this article.
15.2001.30 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Debtor's Verbal Objection to Payment Order Upheld Against Attachment
Cited in relation to the representation requirements for the appellant's representative.
15.2008.24 · ti (Art. 15 LPR)
Debtor's Challenge to Bankruptcy Notice Based on Finality of Judgment and Expiration of Execution Term
Cited in the concluding list, relating to the recognized representation for appeal in enforcement proceedings, although the decision on the merits focused on other articles.
15.2012.113 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Inadmissibility of Execution Appeal Due to Unauthorized Representation and Lack of Jurisdiction
Cited in the preamble before the final ruling, related to the admissibility/representation which formed the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible (Order 1).
15.2012.51 · ti (art. 15 LPR)
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Untimely Filing; Payment Correctly Allocated
The appeal was declared inadmissible based on this cantonal procedural law provision regarding representation.