181.100 LOC

CH-TI

Art. 49 LOC Legge organica comunale (LOC)

LOC

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (258 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 49 LOC

1 Il consiglio comunale si riunisce in sessione ordinaria due volte all’anno. [71]

2 La prima è convocata al più tardi entro il 30 giugno e si occupa in ogni caso del consuntivo dell’anno precedente. [72]

3 La seconda, da tenersi entro il 31 dicembre, si occupa in ogni caso del preventivo dell’anno seguente.

4 ... [73]

5 Il Consiglio di Stato, su istanza motivata del presidente, può prorogare eccezionalmente per motivi di forza maggiore i termini dei capoversi 2 e 3; le richieste di proroga devono essere inoltrate entro il 31 maggio, rispettivamente il 30 novembre . [74]

[71] Cpv. modificato dalla L 14.12.2022; in vigore dal 1.4.2023 - BU 2023, 62.

[72] Cpv. modificato dalla L 14.12.2022; in vigore dal 1.4.2023 - BU 2023, 62.

[73] Cpv. abrogato dalla L 14.12.2022; in vigore dal 1.4.2023 - BU 2023, 62; precedenti modifiche: BU 1999, 273; BU 2008, 627; BU 2014, 191.

[74] Cpv. modificato dalla L 14.12.2022; in vigore dal 1.4.2023 - BU 2023, 62; precedenti modifiche: BU 1999, 273; BU 2008, 627; BU 2014, 191.

← Art. 48 LOC Legge organica comunale (LOC) Art. 50 LOC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (15)

32.2005.214 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Claimant v. Administration: Disability Allowance Reduction and Institutional Stay Duration

Cited to justify the composition of the court (single judge) for deciding the appeal.

32.2006.184 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Agricultural Worker Disability Benefits Appeal Denial

Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the single judge, not in the final orders.

32.2005.243 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Rejection Upheld Based on Medical Assessment Service Findings

Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis allowing the Cantonal Court to decide with a single judge, although the final orders do not directly rely on it for the substantive decision.

32.2005.65 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Pension Appeal for Psychiatric Disability After Vocational Retraining

Cited as a procedural basis allowing the single judge to rule on the case.

34.2006.13 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Insured v. Professional Benefit Fund (Disability Pension Eligibility)

Cited as a procedural basis allowing the decision to be made by a single judge.

52.1995.40 · ti (Art. 49 LOC)

Municipal Councilor v. State Council (Approval of 1993 Final Accounts)

Cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis considered by the court, relating to the deadlines for the approval of the final accounts.

32.2005.214 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Beneficiary v. Federal Office: High-Grade Disability Allowance Reduction Based on Institutional Stay

Cited as the legal basis allowing the Cantonal Court to decide with a single judge due to the nature of the case.

32.2005.243 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Homemaker v. Cantonal Insurance Court (Disability Benefits Appeal)

Cited as the procedural basis allowing the decision to be made by a single judge.

32.2013.86 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Woman vs. AI Office: Disability Rating and Housewife Classification Upheld

Cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge.

34.2006.13 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Claimant v. Pension Fund: Causal Link for Disability Pension Denial

Cited in the reasoning to justify the decision being made by a single judge, although not strictly in the dispositive it relates to the procedural capacity of the court which is implicitly maintained by rejecting the petition.

36.2009.191 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Claimant v. Administrative Office: Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Based on Statutory Income Calculation

Used to justify the decision by a single judge because the case did not raise questions of principle and was not of significant importance.

36.2010.48 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Cross-Border Worker's Failure to Opt-Out of Swiss Health Insurance Due to Alleged Communication Issues

Cited in the reasoning to justify the composition of the court (single judge) for this non-fundamental matter, but its reference is present in the final order regarding procedural application (though not explicitly in the dispositive, the initial reasoning mentions the basis for the single judge use).

36.2019.36 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Insured Health Insurance Affiliation Dispute: Refusal to Reconsider Not Open to Judicial Review

Applied to decide the case with a single judge because no issues of principle were raised.

39.2006.8 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC JUD)

Cantonal Insurance Court Confirms Repayment of Unduly Received Family Supplements Despite Declarations of Provisional Nature

Used to justify the decision being made by a single judge.

42.2012.17 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOC)

Beneficiary Appeal of Denied Social Assistance Benefits Due to Late Renewal Filing

Cited as the basis for the decision being made by a single judge due to the non-principled nature of the case.