181.100
LOC
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 213 LOC Legge organica comunale (LOC)
LOC
Art. 213 LOC
1 Le decisioni degli organi comunali viziate di nullità assoluta possono essere impugnate in ogni tempo.
2 Negli altri casi, il ricorso deve essere inoltrato per iscritto, entro trenta giorni dall’intimazione o dalla data di pubblicazione della decisione impugnata. [303]
3 È applicabile la legge sulla procedura amministrativa del 24 settembre 2013, riservate le disposizioni di altre leggi speciali. [304]
[303] Cpv. modificato dalla L 24.9.2013; in vigore dal 1.3.2014 - BU 2013, 471.
[304] Cpv. modificato dalla L 24.9.2013; in vigore dal 1.3.2014 - BU 2013, 480.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (44)
52.2017.149 · ti (Art. 213 LOC)
Probationary Dismissal and Right to be Heard Cured by Subsequent Appeal
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 1.1) regarding the timeliness of the appeal.
52.2011.187 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 2 LOC)
Appeal Against Municipal Waste Fee Differentiation and Inadequate State Council Review
Cited to confirm the timeliness of the appeal regarding the municipal regulation.
52.2009.236 · ti (art. 213 LOC)
Municipal Tax Multiplier Discretion Violates Tax Legality Principle
Cited to confirm that the appeal was filed within the time limit.
52.2010.143 · ti (Art. 213 LOC)
Municipality v. State Council: Procedural Fairness in Local Citizenship Refusal
Cited in the considerations regarding the timeliness of the appeal (although not explicitly in the dispositive, it is listed in the final citation block before the orders, linking it to the procedural context of the appeal).
52.2001.285 · ti (art. 213 LOC)
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Drainage System Funding Denial
Cited among the provisions considered, concerning the timeliness of the appeal.
52.2008.434 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 2 LOC)
Political Body v. State Council Regarding Annulled Municipal Resolution for Urgent Land Purchase
Cited in the list of applicable articles, relating to the timeliness of the appeal, which justified the consideration that led to the case being struck from the rolls.
52.2007.121 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 2 LOC)
Municipality Ski Lift Subsidy Classification Dispute
Mentioned in the list of provisions considered regarding the timeliness of the appeal.
52.2007.332 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 2 LOC)
Municipality Contract Award Illegality Due to Budget Violation
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding appeal deadlines, although superseded by CIAP.
52.2006.273 · ti (Art. 213 LOC)
Municipality v. Property Owner Regarding Public Right-of-Way Obstruction
This article is cited in the preamble to the decision but not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-5; hence, it is excluded based on the rules.
52.2006.22 · ti (art. 213 LOC)
Company Advertising Van Special Use Denial Appeal
Cited in the section listing the applicable provisions before the final orders, regarding the timeliness of the appeal.
52.2005.290 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 2 LOC)
Property Owner v. State Council on Parking Space Nullification
Cited among the applicable provisions, though the admissibility check (which found the appeal timely) is mentioned in the reasoning section, the final order explicitly confirms the decision based on the listed articles.
52.2004.168 · ti (art. 213 LOC)
Municipal Order Enforcement Against Fence on Public Path Upheld
This article concerning the admissibility of the appeal was cited in the preamble to the orders.
52.2003.37 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 3 LOC)
Appeal Against Domicile Determination Based on Rental and Minor Employment
Cited in the final orders' preamble, related to the timeliness of the appeal procedure (though the main reasoning cites cpv. 2, cpv. 3 is explicitly listed in the preamble).
52.2002.441 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 3 LOC)
Appeal Against Domicile Determination Based on Insufficient Evidence
This procedural provision concerning the applicable law/procedure for the decision was cited in the preamble to the final orders.
52.2002.430 · ti (art. 213 cpv. 3 LOC)
Domicile Transfer Denial Overturned Due to Insufficient Factual Investigation
This procedural provision is listed in the preamble to the final orders as part of the legal basis for the decision, although the substance of the decision relies on procedural fairness and the factual merits.