177.100 LOGGOGLOJ

CH-TI

Art. 49 LOG Legge sull’organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG)

LOG

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (93 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 49 LOG

1 La Sezione di diritto pubblico è composta di 11 giudici e comprende

a) il Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni, composto di 3 membri, che giudica come istanza unica le contestazioni in materia di assicurazioni sociali, come pure le altre contestazioni che gli sono attribuite dalla legge;

b) il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo, composto di 6 membri, che giudica quale istanza unica o di ricorso le contestazioni che gli sono attribuite dalla legge;

c) la Camera di diritto tributario, composta di 3 membri, che giudica le contestazioni che le sono attribuite dalla legge. [59]

2 Il Tribunale cantonale delle assicurazioni, il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo e la Camera di diritto tributario possono decidere nella composizione di un giudice unico le cause che non pongono questioni di principio o che non sono di rilevante importanza.

3 Riservato il capoverso precedente, il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo decide nella composizione di 3 membri.

[59] Cpv. modificato dalla L 18.2.2013; in vigore dal 16.4.2013 - BU 2013, 198; precedente modifica: BU 2008, 139.

← Art. 48b LOG Legge sull’organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) Art. 50 LOG →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (1,488)

32.2025.44 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured Individual v. Disability Benefits Administration (Disability Rating Calculation)

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the Tribunal deciding with a single judge composition.

32.2025.53 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Disability Benefits Appeal: Violation of Right to Be Heard and Remand for Reassessment

Used to justify the court's decision being made by a single judge because the case did not involve principal legal questions.

31.2025.5 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Administrator's Subsidiary Liability for Unpaid Social Insurance Contributions

Cited as the procedural basis allowing the Tribunal to decide with a single judge.

32.2025.12 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Appeal of Disability Denial Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence and Remand

Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's composition by a single judge due to the case not raising fundamental legal questions.

32.2025.28 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured Denied Adult Disability Benefits Based on Pre-Decision Evidence

This provision was cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge in a case deemed not to raise principal legal questions.

32.2025.19 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insurance Office v. Appellant: Retroactive Benefit Offset Against Unpaid Social Security Contributions

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the single judge deciding the case, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders, it is a procedural rule relevant to the decision structure (usually excluded, but included here if the primary legal grounds are absent and procedural rules are heavily cited in justification, however, based strictly on the rule: it should be excluded as it's not in the final orders 1, 2, 3).

32.2024.93 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured vs. Disability Insurance Administration (Foreign Contribution Period)

Cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge.

34.2025.2 · ti (Art. 49 LOG)

Pension Fund v. Employer: Non-Payment of Professional Benefit Contributions

Cited in the reasoning (2.1) to justify the single-judge panel, not a direct ground for the final orders on the merits.

32.2025.26 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured Disability Pension Appeal Granted on Basis of Worsening Medical Evidence

Cited in the reasoning to justify the decision being made by a single judge, which is procedural context for the appeal resolution.

32.2025.5 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured Accepts Settled Disability Rating Based on Residual Earning Capacity Under New Law

Cited as the basis allowing the Cantonal Court to rule with a single judge, as the matter does not raise fundamental legal questions.

32.2024.72 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Disability Insurance Appeal Remanded for Economic Clarification and Legal Aid Granted

Cited to justify the composition of the Court (single judge) deciding the case.

32.2024.73 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured Denied Disability Benefits Due to Insufficient Impairment Threshold

Cited in the reasoning as the procedural basis allowing the court to decide with a single judge.

32.2024.86 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured v. Disability Insurance Office

Cited as the procedural basis allowing the Tribunal to decide with a single judge.

32.2024.83 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Disability Insurance Denial Upheld Despite Appeal of Medical Assessment

Cited in the reasoning (consid. 2.1) to justify the composition of the court (single judge), which is a procedural basis for the decision.

32.2024.85 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)

Insured v. Disability Insurance Office

Cited in the reasoning section as justification for a single judge deciding the case, although not explicitly repeated in the final orders, it pertains to procedural structure; however, based on strict instructions, this article is excluded as it is not in the numbered dispositive orders 1, 2, 3. The focus must remain on provisions applied in the final orders (1, 2, 3).