14.2001.00027 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 1 LTF)
Debt Enforcement Rejection Upheld: CMR Jurisdiction Precludes Swiss Lugano Convention Reservation
Although the decision is from the Cantonal Court, the cost rule cited in the lower court's dispositive (Point 2) which corresponds to this type of ruling, and the reference to its equivalent in Ticino law (art. 62 cpv. 1 OTLEF) supports the inclusion of cost provisions being formally mentioned in the final enumeration.
14.2006.65 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 1 LTF)
Spousal Support Enforcement Opposition Removal Denied Lack of Executory Title
Although the text explicitly mentions 'art. 62 cpv. 1 OTLEF' as a basis for the ruling, I must rely strictly on the cited articles. Since no explicit cost article from the LTF is cited in the dispositive, and the provincial rules (OTLEF) are cited as the basis for the ruling, I will include the cited OTLEF articles.
15.2014.125 · ti (art. 62 LTF)
Enforcement Against Joint Estate Share Exceeding Debt Value
This reference appears to be a typo in the original text's numbering; point 5 refers to OTLEF, and point 3 refers to costs exclusion. Since dispositive point 3 simply states the result, and the reasoning point 5 points to OTLEF, I will only include the explicitly cited OTLEF provisions from the reasoning that were followed by the dispositive.
35.2022.47 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 2 LTF)
Disability Pension Percentage Calculation Dispute: Indexation of Theoretical Income
The appeal was dismissed, and the decision confirms the previous ruling (Art. 2.9), implying the main ground for dismissal is implicit or covered by the procedural ruling on inadmissibility/final disposition.
60.2015.292 · ti (Art. 62 al. 1 LTF)
Access to Closed Penal Files for Civil Proceeding
This provision was cited in the final orders, likely related to costs or general appellate procedure, though its specific role is not detailed in the dispositive beyond being cited alongside the operative articles.
60.2015.342 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 4 LTF)
Transmission of Archived Criminal File for Child Custody Proceedings
Cited in the introductory part of the operative section as applicable law, although the specific provision granting the admissibility of costs order is usually LTF (Swiss Federal Tribunal Act), it is listed here because the decision explicitly references it in its concluding preamble.
72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)
Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial
These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).