Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.110 RDST CH-TI

Art. 60 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 60 RDSt

1 Con la supplenza di cui all’art. 26 LStip, un impiegato assume transitoriamente le responsabilità di una funzione di categoria superiore, oltre a quelle previste per la propria funzione.

2 La supplenza degli impiegati è subordinata all’autorizzazione della Sezione delle risorse umane.

3 Una funzione può essere supplita anche da più impiegati; in tal caso l’indennità è ridotta proporzionalmente alla supplenza prestata.

4 L’indennità per supplenza non è assicurabile ai fini della previdenza professionale e non crea diritti acquisiti.

5 Il conferimento dell’indennità di supplenza esclude la sostituzione del supplito e del supplente con personale ausiliario.

6 In caso di supplenze che si concludono nel corso di un mese, la relativa remunerazione avviene pro rata temporis.

7 La supplenza temporanea di un dipendente comporta il diritto per il supplente a un’indennità mensile stabilita in base alle seguenti fasce di classificazione della funzione del supplito

– dalla classe di funzione 2 alla classe di funzione 5: fr. 200.– mensili;

– dalla classe di funzione 6 alla classe di funzione 8: fr. 300.– mensili;

– dalla classe di funzione 9 alla classe di funzione 11: fr. 400.– mensili;

– dalla classe di funzione 12 alla classe di funzione 20: fr. 500.– mensili.

8 Per i docenti restano riservate le disposizioni del regolamento sulle supplenze dei docenti del 13 febbraio 1996 e le altre norme applicabili.

← Art. 59 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 61 RDSt →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (28)

35.2018.80 · ti (Art. 60 al. 1 LTF)
Insurance Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Late Filing After Postbox Delivery
Although the text mentions Art. 60 al. 1 LPGA in the reasoning regarding timeliness, the dispositive cites Art. 60 LTF (likely a typo in the original text given the context of appeal to the Federal Supreme Court, but based strictly on the provided text and the need to look at the dispositive, the only explicit mention of a general rule for appeal in the final order section is not present, only for the next step of appealing the TCA decision). However, the appeal to the TCA was declared inadmissible. Since the reasons for inadmissibility rely on Art. 38 LPGA, that is the main ground. Art. 60 al. 1 LTF is not explicitly cited in orders 1, 2, or 3.
32.2010.3 · ti (art. 60 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insured's Appeal of Disability Denial Barred by Untimely Filing
This article is implied because the dispositive orders the interested parties on how to appeal to the Federal Tribunal (Tribunale federale), which typically references LTF provisions for appeals against Cantonal Tribunal decisions.
32.2008.190 · ti (art. 60 cpv. 2 LTF)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Despite Medical Certificate Delay
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, this refers to the possibility to appeal the cantonal decision to the Federal Tribunal, which is detailed in order 3.
52.2008.187 · ti (art. 60 al. 1 LTF)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Garage Near Forest Boundary
This reference seems to be a typo in the original text, as it refers to LTF (Federal Supreme Court Law) but the decision is from the Cantonal Administrative Tribunal. However, since it is explicitly cited in the preamble alongside other procedural articles governing the decision, it must be listed based on strict adherence to the source text.
52.2007.321 · ti (art. 60 al. 1 LTF)
Appeal Against Annulment of Building Permit Regarding Height and Floor Area Calculation
Implied by 'art. 60 PAmm' which governs costs, although costs are explicitly mentioned in order 2, the explicit reference in the final disposition is to 'art. 60 PAmm' and 'art. 61 PAmm' from the Cantonal procedural law.
52.2007.114 · ti (art. 60 al. 1 LTF)
Construction Company Registration Dispute and Subcontracting Finding
This article is referenced in point 3 of the operative part as a basis for appeal, but the reference in the text is actually 'art. 82 ss LTF'. Since 'Art. 60 al. 1 LTF' is not listed in the final citation block or the operative part, and the operative part cites 'art. 82 ss LTF' and 'art. 113 ss LTF', I must rely on the explicit citations in the dispositive section. The citation block before the operative part cites 'art. 82 ss LTF' and 'art. 113 ss LTF'. No cost/legal aid provision is cited in the operative part itself (only point 2 regarding court fees).
52.2007.137 · ti (art. 60 LTF)
Hotel Fire Safety Upgrades: Current vs. Prior Code Compliance
Not explicitly cited in the dispositive, but implied in the reference to Art. 82 ss LTF regarding appeal to the Federal Tribunal.
52.2004.234 · ti (Art. 60 cpv. 1 LTF)
Vineyard Construction Permit Denial on Agricultural Land
This article is likely included incorrectly in the provided text (it is Art. 60 PAmm or Art. 66 LTF for costs), but based strictly on the explicit list provided at the end, '60 PAmm' is included above. Since no provision strictly equivalent to 'Art. 60 LTF' is found explicitly in the dispositive orders for costs, and the relevant cost article seems to be Art. 61 PAmm (or implicitly Art. 66 for appeal costs if it were a federal court), I will only include what is explicitly listed in the final section: Art. 61 PAmm.
52.2003.294 · ti (Art. 60 LTF)
Building Permit Cancellation Upheld Due to Height and Facade Violations
Cited in the formal invocation of law for the decision.
52.1998.76 · ti (Art. 60 LTF)
Appeal Against Municipal Order to Suspend Unauthorized Stable Renovation Dismissed
This article was cited in the final orders, pertaining to the imposition of judicial fees following the outcome of the appeal.
52.1994.10 · ti (Art. 60 LTF)
Administrative Court Upholds Limited Refreshment Permit Despite Objections on Frequency and Dual Management
Cited in the list of applicable provisions, but not explicitly in the final orders regarding costs or legal aid.
11.2017.10 · ti (Art. 60 Costi LTF)
Artisan Collective Hypothec Registration Dispute and Moot Appeal Costs Assessment
Cited in the reasoning concerning the application of federal appeal deadlines.
36.2006.236 · ti (Art. 60 LTF)
Insured's Challenge to Benefit Suspension Barred by Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of review.
36.2006.45 · ti (Art. 60 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insurer's Delay in Health Insurance Suspension Decision for Grave Patient
Not cited in the dispositive.
52.2004.234 · ti (art. 60 al. 1 LTF)
Vineyard Permit Denial Over Crop Rotation Area Designation
This seems to be a citation error in the original text as there is no LTF/BGG article 60 in the dispositive list (the list contains Art. 60 PAmm). However, based strictly on the final article list provided: Art. 60 PAmm is included above.