173.110
RDST
CH-TI
Art. 56 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)
RDSt
Art. 56 RDSt
1… [44]
2 Il Consiglio di Stato può stabilire annualmente l’importo complessivo disponibile a scopo di premio per prestazioni eccezionali.
3 Il premio versato, convertito in corsi o perfezionamento professionale oppure consumato in tempo libero, non può superare il 5% del salario annuo del destinatario, riferito al periodo in cui è stata prodotta la prestazione eccezionale, rispettivamente 10 giorni di congedo pagato.
[44] Cpv. abrogato dal R 27.3.2019; in vigore dal 29.3.2019 - BU 2019, 108.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (6)
38.2007.54 · ti (art. 56 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insured Party's Improper Appeal Transmitted for Administrative Review
Cited as the provision allowing parties to appeal the current decision to the Federal Supreme Court (Tribunale federale).
11.2017.10 · ti (Art. 56 Costi LTF)
Artisan Collective Hypothec Registration Dispute and Moot Appeal Costs Assessment
Cited in the reasoning concerning the application of federal appeal deadlines.
12.2013.128 · ti (art. 56 LTF)
Debt Discharge Confirmation Following Extinctive Cash Payment Testimony
LTF article related to legal aid, but not cited in the dispositive.
34.2007.56 · ti (art. 56 LTF)
Cantonal Insurance Tribunal Pension Wealth Division Case
This provision is implicitly relevant as Art. 206 LTF (which governs appeals from Cantonal Insurance Tribunals to the Federal Supreme Court) often refers to the appeal procedure outlined generally in the LTF, but the dispositive only cites the timeframe for appeal and does not cite a specific LTF article for the appeal right itself (it only mentions the right to appeal as per the subsequent paragraph).
72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)
Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial
These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).
90.2007.53 · ti (art. 56 LTF)
Municipality v. Cantonal Council: Zoning Plan Approval and Building Prohibition Challenge
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis governing appeal to the Federal Tribunal.